I’d argue that they would never be totally unplayable. F-15E can play long BVR and win due to having more Fox3’s. Su-30 can just use R-77-1 as APS lol.
Those are just examples at random figures. Calm yourself down.
Calm what? Is it restricted to say that 18g structural limit is nonsense for combat aircraft?
1 Like
Its a rule applied to EVERY aircraft in game. All have a 1.5x safety margin on their structural limitations. It has no impact on aerodynamic capabilities.
1.5x to 9g, not 12g that isn’t actual safe limit, but ability to go in 9… 9x1.5 g region
1 Like
Just nerf the rafale g limiter
This is offense to all strength of material scientists
1 Like
Wannabe mod
1 Like
sharing the rules because theyre public
anyway
2 Likes
9G isn’t the structural limit for Typhoon, 12G is. So the safety margin is applied to that figure.
1 Like
It’s not, it’s ability to turn of 9G absolute safe limit to go in not that safe regimes that are still bellow 9*1.5g
1 Like
Well this is awkward for you…
13 Likes
What does it have to do with justifying that Rafael can turn 18g
Nothing? the subject has clearly changed.
Thats a limitation of the game engine…If a loaded F-4 can pull 9G yet it’s manual states no more than 4.5. Why shouldnt a Typhoon be able to pull double what the manual states?
Guys who complain about the Eurocanards have no idea how lethal they are. It’s like being mad at a Spitfire because it’s great.
1 Like
9g is a limit that it can pull without any possible damage for the airframe. 12g is when airframe damage is likely to occur.
source?
2 Likes
That’s the point… While everyone uses 1.5x to limit that won’t damage plane anyhow, fantasy delta canards use modifier to limit that can damage airframe…
1 Like
Nope. For example Su-27 would disintegrate if it would pull the same G’s as Eurofighter or Rafaello does. Material science, man.