Gunjob doesnt have any say on Gaijins game balancing designs.
Typhoon and Rafale if it was realistic in game should wipe the floor with everything.
Gaijin have made an attempt to make the new Su-30SM and F-15E not totally unplayable.
1 Like
I’d argue that they would never be totally unplayable. F-15E can play long BVR and win due to having more Fox3’s. Su-30 can just use R-77-1 as APS lol.
Those are just examples at random figures. Calm yourself down.
Calm what? Is it restricted to say that 18g structural limit is nonsense for combat aircraft?
1 Like
Its a rule applied to EVERY aircraft in game. All have a 1.5x safety margin on their structural limitations. It has no impact on aerodynamic capabilities.
1.5x to 9g, not 12g that isn’t actual safe limit, but ability to go in 9… 9x1.5 g region
1 Like
Just nerf the rafale g limiter
This is offense to all strength of material scientists
1 Like
Wannabe mod
1 Like
sharing the rules because theyre public
anyway
2 Likes
9G isn’t the structural limit for Typhoon, 12G is. So the safety margin is applied to that figure.
1 Like
It’s not, it’s ability to turn of 9G absolute safe limit to go in not that safe regimes that are still bellow 9*1.5g
1 Like
Well this is awkward for you…
13 Likes
What does it have to do with justifying that Rafael can turn 18g
Nothing? the subject has clearly changed.
Thats a limitation of the game engine…If a loaded F-4 can pull 9G yet it’s manual states no more than 4.5. Why shouldnt a Typhoon be able to pull double what the manual states?
Guys who complain about the Eurocanards have no idea how lethal they are. It’s like being mad at a Spitfire because it’s great.
1 Like
9g is a limit that it can pull without any possible damage for the airframe. 12g is when airframe damage is likely to occur.
source?
2 Likes
That’s the point… While everyone uses 1.5x to limit that won’t damage plane anyhow, fantasy delta canards use modifier to limit that can damage airframe…
1 Like