its in cockpit programmable
It’s either incompetence, lack of care, or intentional, but they’re stubbornness to not fix the Radar is becoming unbelievably frustrating
1 Like
Tbf, its been less than a week and we have no real numerical source for whats wrong with the radar. Just that it does not perform anywhere near what was advertised. Expecting a buff/fix considering gaijins track record of making western stuff perform as bad as humanly possible despite primary sources when we dont even have tertiary sources here to argue with is kind of insane.
I think the designers/manufacturers of the CAPTOR-M would probably cry if they saw what was made the representation of their work tho.
This is probably one of gaijins wet dreams, they get to pretend one of the high performance radars in use by modern NATO jets is a pile of garbage while the glorious russian PESA is gods gift to radars, and nobody has any sources to even make them look like idiots.
@Gunjob @Flame2512 radar aside, shouldnt the RWR be better than this? I didnt expect any “Unknowns” to be in its RWR catalogue…
4 Likes
No enemy display on HUD in ASB
1 Like
Probably because it would take more effort and Gaijin doesnt want to “honor” anyone that isnt from the allied side, despite the fact the Red Baron flew in WW1 instead of 2
what do you expect? these same Incompetent thinks German Leopard 2A7V which is newer and heavier have less protection than Strv122 because Swedish trials say so. (The test was conducted it before 2A7V even born)
Well i guess we’ll never get the same handheld as their beloved Russia.
3 Likes
So they don’t have to give f4 kws LV aim9li-1
Aim-9M was given instead of 9Li-1 (although it is already with a smokeless engine)
Wonder what reason we are going to receive for that
1 Like
That is an incredibly stupid take since the the Camo they have in game IS LITERALLY FROM THE RED BARON. It’s just a different camo from the Squadron compared to the one I posted.
Also not a single other camo they could have added would have anything to do with any person. It was mostly Tiger-Meet camos
It doesnt show his face tho
What the hell? isn’t that exactly same missile?
In terms of ingame performance, yes. I still would have preferred to keep the AIM9L/I-1, just for the name
4 Likes
Weird I see Swedish have 9M with their own name (RB74M )
1 Like
same, if game performance is the same, just leave the missile with the more realistic sounding name.
Especially since:
@Smin1080p_WT why this change?
Hope they revert that change
Probs cuz there was evidence the 9L/i-1 didnt have a smokeless motor, so theyre removing it but didnt want a fit from the german community, so they did this instead.
2 Likes
AIM-9L/I-1 was found to not have a smokeless motor after all. So AIM-9M was issued to keep the EF-2000 Block 10 in line with the other two. We would have preffered to use a domestic missile (which is why AIM-9L/I-1 was added in the first place), but sadly its not possible.
10 Likes
Would it not be possible to make both missiles available? So with the AIM9M modification you get both the AIM9M and the AIM9L/I-1? Just to leave us the option to choose the domestic variant?
2 Likes