Well, old FGR4 could get ALARM
Question then, when is it possible to make a report and suggest that an aircraft is changed to a different standard/variant? Cause it doesn’t always seem to be possible.
Generally when its a very modern aircraft that was based on prospective / future / current upgrades in this case and there could be an error with the current implementation. In this case, there is not, which is why its a suggestion until the devs decide.
1 Like
this plane in game is missing a lot of T4 Features
the Pirate can be quickly installed and removed on all EFTs
Bug report Volunteers can make mistakes
Yep, most of P4E hasnt been added yet
The fact, that the loadout options for the inner most wing pylon have been denied is criminal tbh.
just dont look at the Tiger UHT outer pylon option …
I would argue that the UHT has more pressing issues than the outer pylons.
For example: it has a detailed damage model, yet the OSIRIS above the rotor are only the targeting optics and for some fcking reason the Pilots FLIR sensor below the Nose is used for weapon guidance, when several sources state, that the FLIR is 1. directly linked to the pilots helmet and moves in sync with it and 2. is only used to provide a high resolution IR image for night and bad weather flights. what about the UHTs capability to prelock targets and fire all missiles at said prelocked targets instantly? At least the PARS 3 are performing as they are IRL…
the point is that the HAC instantly has been added with all of the Tiger UHT weapon options it should be having…
I agree that it’s BS, not the first time Gaijin managed to fuck something up that hard.
So why do the Typhoon’s only get 2 HARMs? All the info I’ve seen shows it can carry up to 6 on the wing pylons. Am I missing something?
1 Like
Clear marketing lie
Gaijin is terrorfied of the Typhoon’s having competitive A2G performance
Yeah I’d really like to see what document they used for it only carrying 2. Not like carrying 6 would be an issue considering the HARM is leagues worse than Kh31.
I dont think primary documents have anything to do with it. I think they just wanted to limit the Typhoons to 2
Eternal suffering. I’ll just leave my comment there and see if anything comes of it lol (doubt).
Credit where the credit is due.
GJ didn’t put this in patch notes, but did one great detail that I appreciate a lot.
So, what GJ did is finally set the Stores Management System right and now the EF will launch wing 120s first, then the rear fuselage 120s and finally the front fuselage pair. Not sure whether this is done on EuFi alone, or other planes as well, but I observed it on +EF2000 and F2000.
There’s only one thing that can be done to make it even better and it’s when we’re left with, say, 2xsingle 120s on the stations 2 and 12 and 2xAIM9s (1 and 13) and you launch one 120, the next AIM9 that will be launched is going to be from the same wing. The SMS should try to maintain the drag equilibrium, so the AIM9 launched right after 120, should be from the opposite wing. This isn’t for AAMs only, but other hung weapons as well.
But, I know this is looking for a needle in a haystack :D This is a great fix and I love it.
Super Cruising performance: Marketing Lie
Quantity of HARM missiles: Marketing Lie
BOL performance: Marketing Lie
General Flight Performance: Marketing Lie
MMW Brimstones?: Too op
Spear-3 or Brimstone-2 ? Denied
I think picture is pretty clear if you ask me…
4 Likes