IPA 7 used to be with Airbus/EADS, now is supposedly with WTD 61 along with IPA 8.
The sole Eurofighter EF2000 at WTD 61 is instrumented production aircraft (IPA) 3. Besides the ODIN project, the jet is used as a test bed for a project to extend the life of the brake parachute. In the future, two more IPAs are expected to join WTD 61: IPAs 7 and IPA 8 are already at Manching but are still operated by Airbus Defence and Space.
It says currently in your picture.
It is not impossible that the ownership got transfered to the bundeswehr
I found this german “article”:
it basicly says that the IPA-7 entered Service as GS029/30+44 and then served as a testbed at airbus.
So from my understanding it is a German owned airframe that Airbus uses to test shit.
GS0029 is just the serial number. GS because its a German Single (GT for German Trainer). the 30+44 is just the designation it would have gotten if it went into service with the German Air Force. this excerpt really doesnt prove anything except that its being used by airbus.
then give my soild evidence that it was infact an airframe that was fully owned by airbus otherwise this disscussion dosent make any sense
I would be able to live with it rn to have an airframe thats alot better once it is fixed
so we can atleast agree that the IPA7 is an airframe that was ordered by germany?
Or rather, the Typhoon wants a high-performance radar and can only wait for the catcher E，If so, how long will it take for this change to come?
It probably will perform identical to the Captor-M right now
Isn’t the Catcher M considered the best performing electronically scanned radar? The current in-game performance is really not flattering
Captor-M is often considered the best mechanically scanned radar but ingame I would take the APG-65 from the F-4F ICE any day of the week
Oh yes, Catcher M is a mechanical scanning radar (a mistake caused by typing too fast), so can the Typhoon be considered ruined by Gaijin’s bad Catcher M (forgive me for my bad English, this is the translator used)
Can someone please explain how i got killed by a fox-3 when i was 25m above the ground and I was chaffing. (wasnt chaffing in the gif but was beffore i was hit)
Looks like marketing lies
It would have been coming from a much higher angle. The higher the angle, the less of a difference multipathing makes. It could have also just hit the building bringing the explosion closer to you.
Or just some other shenanigans
Always with western tech. Only facts when its russian.
Yup, to defeat multipathers, shoot a fox3/1 at them head on from like 3-8ish km out at like a 60 degree upwards angle. the missile will multipath top down, which lets them proxy
3 AMRAAMS got launched at you from high alt, Multipathing kicked in at the very last second to avoid direct impacts and you got smacked by a mixture of them proximity detonating on you and smacking into the houses you were overflying. The third missile (which hit after you were killed) came down directly on top of you and was a direct impact.
