It won’t be top BR. The EMBT tech demonstrator lacks armor and penetration power compared to 12.7 tanks. Pen and armor profile warrant 11.7?
No different from Leopard 2A6 being 12.7
It’s actually a completely new chassis granted modeled wrong
I hope we can see the 140mm version in game before 2035
That’s if we ever see any nation 130/140s lmao it’s been over 2 years since the 292

are you sure :`)
Gaijin seems pretty adamant that strv 122 and leo are fundamentally different armor packages and not just iterations of the same tech. Even if they look like the same tech from the outside. And are manufacteured by the same company
so its just like the leclerc which are, infact, 12.7 tanks according to gaijins balancing
Allo Allo this is nighthawk calling
I will addon by saying that when it comes to tech tree MBTs at rank 8, only 2 are 12.0 and the rest are 12.3-12.7, so it’s likely to around there
Amazing! German engineers develop first 0mm RHA composite equivalent armor.
Place your bets now it it makes if it makes it to live
- Yes
- No
Lore accurate western armor (according to Gaijin) /s
I was really looking forward to EMBT until I saw it was limited to OFL F1 instead of DM53, and when I realised that the Leopard 2A7 hulls are still underperforming; performing barely as a 1990s 2A5 prototype and worse than the service Leopard variants from the early 2000s.
If those things could be addressed, it would make the tank far more exciting!
Holy selection border

; 

High pen rounds also outright pen the quarter circle on the right hand of the breach…

An actually robust turret^
The Zenturion video was an eyeopener
This armor profile is wrong. You cannot penetrate the UFP of Leopards.
The correct armor profile:

Notice how these are 2 different posts, and shooting at the same armor with different ammo from different guns?
notice how the dots that are overdrawn with the actual penetration possible box in my original post are there. And how they only show up on the 1000m option?
And notice how the left armor on strv 122 shows less green at 1000m than at 500m? You think i lied when i made a seperate post?
You could atleast have fact checked this yourself before accusing me of lying


