Your second point is entirely irrelevant, as all nations, except for Israel, already have decent short range SAMs.
And sure, if being concerned about the balance means that I’m being salty, then I’ll happily continue being salty.
Also, “my” nations (even though I’m concerned about all nations when it comes to Anti Air) SAM hasn’t been announced or even leaked yet.
I have to disagree. Pretty much every nation but Russia needs a newer, more capable SPAA system. Rolling them out to only a few nations at a time is not the ticket here. Especially when you consider which nations often get paired together.
The irony when a russian main cries about other nations getting better SPAA’s
PAC-2, S-300, HQ-9, CAMM-ER, Type03 and NASAMS when?
they are not coming since they outrange spawn, are multi vehicle and none is a “frontline” system, all of them are supposed to operate at least 10km behind the line, which is with the current map design not possible/planed, they need time to be put in fire possition, and should never be used without short range SPAA support, which is not implemented in the current mission design and not communicated to be in develoopment sofar
U are aware spyder aio and iris-t slm are coming with 40km range right?
Its only a question of where gsjins limit is
i do not thrust leaks, and since both are not announced yet, i will not change my mind
Ah yeah, not believing in the guys that had multiple patches right. Sure
in my opinion
those leak are mostly controlled by gaijin, or do you think gaijin is incapable to find 1 or 2 devs which pirce through informations, those leaks are most likely controlled, by gaijin in order to create hype.
if those leaks are aquirred through hacks, gaijin wouldnt make a good picture of themself in terms of cyber security.
therefore
i do think they will test the short range ir missles before they try long range systems
Doesn’t the Pantsir already outrange spawn on certain maps? like vietnam
it does but pansir is considered op by many players, including me, and i do not think all problems disappear if we just add other spaa, only with the intention to be the same lvl of op
the same leakers who have leaked updates before?
Yea probably
This is used in many games so it not a surprise
oh you sweet summerchild
for me its not “leaking” if it comes persistent 2 weeks before 1. dev blog with fake lists, 1 week later comes a 40% correct list, and the playerbase hypes him, like he had leaked the plan for the next 3 years, from a game company never a leak existed before and taked the leaker as gods talking the thruth in advance
they literaly leaked the name of a teaser video a few minutes before the official teaser reveal to screw with gajin
you know that youtube videos have to be preloaded and are rendered at youtube servers? also it happend to the GTA trailer, the structure which hides uploaded but not puplished videos is not save on youtube, and there are algorithms out there which try to find unpublished videos, based on the short link sharing format of youtube
well we found the gajin fanboy defending the company even during boycots etc
i am not defending gaijin, i just want to raise awareness that those leakers could be something diffrent than most players belive they are
i am not a fan of 80€ packs, 1 death leaver, some br placements, auctions and i absolutly hate the new event cycle, but that is off topic
I came to the same conclusion and asked a mod. He told me to wait till the update drops. I hope yes.
ON THE TOPIC of multy part Vehicles/Trailer vehicles.
That would open up SO MANY COOL new doors.
Like the 5,5 cm Gerät 58 pulled by a Sd.Kfz.7. To shoot at high altitude bombers like Pe-8 in GRB, or just to blow anything out of the sky with 120rpm of 2 kg He shells with 460g HTA at 1020m/s.
Or this beast. (I think 15 cm or 10,5 cm)
Or this 12,8 cm Flak 40 L/61, like the Sturer, but no armor, less depression, 360 traverse, higher fire rate and no armor at all.
Looking like a Madmax Truck (with 105mm Flak.)
12,8 cm Pak 44 L/55, like Jagdtiger, but no armor, except gunshield.
Would it be worse than a vehicle mounted gun? Yes.
Would it still be an interesting take, as such was used IRL and would offer more possibilitys in game? YES.
Could it also be used as a cheap way to fill some gaps of TD and AA? Yes.
