General discussion for the Eitan and it’s performance.
4 Likes
if we talking about eitan it would be nice to see it in some configuration on 10.0, for example with 105mm sabra turret or mythical 40mm autocannon that is mentioned in half of articles about that vehicle and noone said whats gun is that, it would be similar to VCBI and don’t have to play again russian 11.3…
Now this vehicle is kinda useless bcs of lack of firepower
I hope we get this vehicle soon
4 Likes
they have for sure change in first place eitan’s modifications tech tree,
it’s unreasonable that HI-TEC high-tier vehicle have to suffer on 11.3 while being one of the worst vehicles on that BR playing APDS that cant penetrate anything even on side armor, without thermo, lR / tracking radar and ATGM that you can’t rely on (you gonna get like 1 kill per 10 spikes so it’s not counted at all + can carry only 4 of them) you have no programmable ammo like for example in boxers that are 0.7 br lower, no 0.50 cal, its mean 0 Anti-air capabilities. Your speed is just decent and armor not exist at all. It used to have spall liner on dev server but they took it away for some reason. The APS is useless at all cuz noone ever gonna shot ATGM at you at this battle rating…
The vehicle got a lot of “features” that are totally basic, not giving any advantage and uptiers eitans battlerating
In the end this vehicle should be downtiered at least to 10.7 same that squadron freccia with 10 spikes is on
Unless you steal their blueprints and take one to gaijins headquarter forget about programmable shells
aka Mk 310
like there is no even evidence of exist ammo like kh-38IR, nothing how LMURS perform but they’re somehow in game and broking toptier, also there is a lot of evidence about spikes that should make them better but they keep it useless cuz they’re not in russian techtree
Probably just the 40mm conversion that all Bushmaster II guns are capable of undergoing. I doubt said conversion actually happened on the Eitan, Namer, or any other Israeli 30mm platform for that matter though.
3 Likes
Well it’s a Russian game what did you expect?
They themselves said we might have a little bias
“little bias”
overperforming everything for years
its a mock-up, i dont know if we’ll receive it tbh
1 Like
Eitan ammorack fire counts as internal
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/PqeT49pJhy6k
Eitan P incorrect overpressure triggers
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/PIFIDfJbn0zv
Eitan still has SPIKE missiles in hull when taking only 2
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/rljcw2I3bvfN
If anyone wants to remake the bug report about it having wrong radar detection speeds for the MAW, feel free
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/Ukm5OGGUTy9L
2 Likes
What?? You must be confused with the 40mm grenade launcher.
no i talking aboug real 40mm gun like in cv9040
Thers its no such thing as an Eitan with that cannon caliber
1 Like
its mentioned in a lot of sources mostly its copy-paste as i see but it is mentioned so maybe they gonna do smth about it
there is also no thing irl like KH38 with ir seeker but ut is in game
its just mentioned
share the sources pls.
must be misinformation sites or smth
Yeah but there’s something that makes them different kh38 is a Russian munition
While on the other hand Eitan is a NATO vehicle everything about it could be marketing lies
Isn’t it obvious?
1 Like
Not trying to be rude or anything at all. But the Eitan is not a NATO. Israel is not part of NATO. They are part of what is called MNNA. But I do agree. If it isn’t Russian. Good luck getting anything modeled correctly. Russia gets mock ups and fake things added. No other nation gets the same treatment as much as Russia does.
2 Likes
Ik people call it minor nation syndrome but it’s really not it’s just none Russian “syndrome”
1 Like