That is what we are afraid off. Will be very difficult, sometimes impossible to explain and prove to users that ECM X is efficient against radar or seeker Y and not efficient against radar or seeker Z. Even if we have reasonable assumptions for this.
SPS-141 uses square swept wave and inverse con scan techniques, AIM-7 from C to F versions use conical scanning for direction finding. HOJ may not help at all. But who cares: HOJ defeats ECM, SPS-141 is trash e.t.c.
Cough;
Too bad F-104S.ASA is most affected by the missing ECM in the game.
IIRC, Their RWR was part of ECM or something else.
RWR, ARM and ECM are designed to “work” with specific and known threats.
It should be defined somehow against which of them it works and how well.
Highly likely it is impossible to obtain solid reference - a lot of space for game designers to play with this game mechanics and a lot of space for others to complain that it doesn’t work as it should.
I have no doubt the mechanics will need to be simplified for game purposes. Honestly its totally expected and anyone who wasn’t expecting it to be that way is kidding themselves.
I think it gives the game designers lots of room to create fun an interesting mechanics. Which will massively broaden the SPAA gameplay from the current “spawn, don’t move and shoot things”. Also for ARB we can have loads of super fun gameplay with huge maps and more variations in the GBAD assets to strike.
You too can make suggestions about additions to the game in air/ground/naval sections. Just because someone makes a suggestion about a certain part of the game doesn’t mean it will be added immediately or make other game modes irrelevant for a patch. In the incoming patch there will be ray tracing and some other stuff which will benefit the ground mostly, there’s also a reworked map specifically for the tank battles. Not only that, every major patch brings new stuff to all branches be it a new game mechanic or a vehicle.
For the life of me I just cannot see your point.
maybe just maybe dont answer to stuff thats months old jesus, dont butt into stuff where u arent even aware of anything
reasons u dont answer to month old conversation were u arent aware of anything
he literaly asked /demanded it for the coming patch
Hello, it seems like developers removed the C/D band receiving capabilities from the APR-39. And i get it, APR-39 and ALR-56 use the omnidirectional antennas for the C/D bands. But they still should display low band threats from all directions in front at 12 o’clock. Will you add this capability back?