Yes, i miss read it with the 1000m values, still 152 is over the 140 mark
My screenshot shows a 150mm pen though ?
And in game is 152, so it does match it
Doesn’t mean it can’t do better
But i agree that with the sources we have, there’s little chance it gets buffed
Doesnt mean that it can do 190 mm either, and the +140mm is still the reference value for the longer 255mm case
All there is to it is :
Lenz-Odermat gives 160-170 for the 165mm long rod (219mm for total length of the round)
The round’s length was increased by 36mm since then
I let you do the maths. I’m fine with 160 though, it can shred through a lot already quite easily.
Hopefully they fix the 2 missing Akerons though, that one is annoying
Im working on a report with Mulatu. Hopefully we can share more in the afternoon. Doing some pixel measurements among other things. The reports currently open and not accepted have too many assumptions that hopefully can be answered through mulatu’s report. Hopefully it will bring the 140mm at 1500m figure
2 Likes
This report indirectly supports the jaguar care to support it?
Other french vehicles missing the brune terre de france camo that the jaguar has gotten.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/i6s4rkGedCCe
5 Likes
We already have better than that performance in game. The round slightly overperforms at close ranges rn.
“>140mm”
Not “140mm”
We have 152mm in game… so yes. >140mm
Yes and an other source with 150mm LOS at 1500m
The round doesn’t seem to overperform
at close ranges, it overperforms by about 10mm… it certainly isnt underperforming
it is in fact slightly underperforming but not by very much
idk why you say it’s over performing at close range but the only value we have to estimate that is 140 mm of equivalent protection pierced at 1500 m ( a 70 mm thick plate with a 60 ° angle ) wich seems almost correct in game
Not true, we have a CTAI graph for example.
really ? do you mind sending it ?
hmmm dont take it badly but that dont really look like an official graph to me …
why do you think that? it’s just getting on 20 years old…
and if it indeed is then the shell is underperforming at close range