After being captured and used in combat, Deserter was withdrawn from frontline service as it was too large to use allied bridges to proceed up the Italian front line. The above clips shows Deserter in its later comparative mobility trials against Shermans and Churchills. Fantastic footage.
No, because the british don’t really need it, other original british vehicles could be added in it’s place, and “fullfill it’s job” in terms of armor and firepower, like the Challenger I stage I or what ever this thing is
Of who? Henschel & Son; Henschel Works doesn’t exist anymore; it was merged and then dissolved, and Wegmann & Co., which produced the turret, was absorbed by KNDS. Becoming a Subsidiary and no longer exists. Also, the people who designed and produced it are long dead.
So who would you give the parts, hull, and turret to?
The ones long gone? Or the ones still maintaining the bloody thing?
Cause if you gave it to those no longer on this plane of existence. It will look like this after some time.
USA use of captured German equipment is interesting though the western allies where seen rightfully as a unstoppable logistical steamroller people forget there where lean times. Due to Germany withdrawing from France lots of artillery and there ammo would fall into USA hands and to solve some of the overloaded logistics some would be used. If I remember right two field battalions would use the 10.5cm IeFH 18 fieldpiece and another would use the 88 in a indirect fire role. It did happen for the Allies would use in a organized form captured weapons outside of random or special events.