E100 is not accurate from a historical standpoint

Oh, I can answer why, it used to have like a 20k repair cost, with the earning multiplier of a BR 2.0 tank. So most people that had it, didn’t ever use it much as it is still comparable in performance to a Maus.

Though they fixed the repair costs years later, the damage was already done.

No. No turret was ever made for it. and it certainly wasn’t destroyed before reaching the hull.

These claims are as ridiculous as those that claim the Maus was used in combat.


…hypocrisy

1 Like

“…the 7.5cm gun was mounted above the 12.8cm gun.”

Boi, must’ve been fun reloading that thing. Unless the main gun was mounted very low in the turret in the first place to ease the loading of 28kg shells. Then I guess it wouldnt’ve been so bad, the 7.5cm would’ve been at about shoulder level.


Image comes from Ed Francis Armoured Archives FB.

It’s not hypocrisy as TOG 2 in it’s final form didn’t even look like that. The Besa sponsons and hull 3-Inch only existed very early on and with a different turret entirely. The whole great war mod should be removed.

Gaijin just made an entirely fake configuration for TOG 2. At least E100 with Maus turret is based on something. I’d be happy to see another E100 added with the alternate turret.

1 Like

Yea there was a plan to mount the Maus turret but it was simply to heavy to have it on the E100