Dutch Leopard 2A6 should be foldered with 2A5

I can’t see why German Leopard 2A6 is foldered with Leopard 2A5, but the Dutch ones are not.

It’s virtually the exact same tank except for a slightly longer barrel…

folder

4 Likes

When the German ones were added, they weren’t foldered :P
Germany also had to research the PSO before the 2A7, Gaijin probably wanted to recreate that for Fr*nce.
Can’t have any nation easily researching an insane tank ;)

1 Like

Because folders weren’t a thing yet xD

I mean… Leopard 2A6 was insane back in 2020- but I assure you it’s not “insane” anymore xD

They’re not getting foldered until something comes after. Using the German Leopards logic, it has 2 vehicles right after it. Those Dutch Leopards are only there for filling gaps purpose.

2 Likes

But we do not need Dutch Leopards in a French tree…

7 Likes

I agree. But they want you to research all the placeholder variant before you get a 2A7

edit: I can see if you ever got a 2A7 in Fr*nch tree, they’d folder the A5/A6

Never needed. French needs more Leclerc, three of them compared with the massive numbers of modification this MBT had is more than enough to fill the 9.7 - 12.0 gap.

1 Like

every nation needs a leopard 2

So Leopard in a Soviet, Chinese and Israeli tree?

yep

1 Like

Why not? Just like the Sherman.

Jokes apart, finally people are starting to waking up about this issue with sub tech trees.

2 Likes

But wait, not every country have Mustang in a tech tree. So Mustangs - first

and a bunch of T-54/55s and a couple of T-72s while we’re at it

I mean, i dont mind either way, im just going to use them to not waste xp spading the leclercs

But with no jokes, there is much more to add domestic variants. Even prototype Leclerc is a good start

Well, Japan has TKX and Type 10 foldered being the end of the line. Foldering should be default for vehicles that are extremely similar in any case and across all BRs.

Indeed. Not just new ones, like XLR or UAE (leaving aside the EMBTs), but most of all; BUG FIXES on the Leclercs, including but not limited to:

Leclerc MBTs acceleration is too low.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/HgmaEsdZnJDF

Leclerc AZUR armor not modeled properly.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/2cQLnqc95weq

Leclerc SXXI incorrect composite armor.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/3OYYIJZ3sync

Leclerc AZUR incorrect armor model.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/laZ1T4CQHNtG

Leclerc MBTs are lacking acceleration.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/BKi4NkUxATlZ

UFP Leclerc S1 S2 SXXI incorrect.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/f0Z2qMBo2GwX

Leclerc MBTs Incorrect Front Fuel Tanks Geometry/Categorization.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/hqK5WT7TXIgN

Leclerc AZUR missing LWS.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/2QPU8eJZaDIP

1 Like

Leclerc T4 my beloved.

This becomes more sad, when even Arietes have more differences than Leclercs in-game (they only weighs more and more)

1 Like

I disagree, because the German ones shouldn’t be foldered. The PSO and 2A6 should swap positions.