I am not saying it isn’t fine, but just saying both vehicles were nearly identical, but keeping british one in a higher BR was quite silly to me. Glad that it is fixed now.
Prefer to have Sherman V tho, we used a lot, but Gaijin just declines to give those.
Do you mean the AMX-13 with M24 turret?
What I mean is, France should’ve had regular M24 because they were the biggest export user of M24 Chaffee.
Shouldn’t be Skink because Americans didn’t have any ties with those.
Experimental Canadian-designed SPAA with Brit-Polish-designed ripoff 20mm autocannons, that considered as SPAA for Britain and Canadian forces, eventually cancelled, no american adoption were considered at all.
There was no historic tie to add Skink to the American tech tree except ‘B…but… it has Sherman hull!’
If Skink addition on US TT was fine because nothing but the “hull of Skink was based on American design”.
Then we can claim every 105mm armed American tank because they used 105mm L7, and german can claim they can claim that every 120mm armed Abrams and Chally 3 should be added on german tree because they used 120mm Rh120.
Yes, the American tech tree needed SPAA to fill the gap, but Skink shouldn’t be the one that picked.
it is as hilarious as giving Austrian Light tank with french tech into german tech tree when Argentine isn’t subtree of germans.
yea but from the other side someone would say the Sherman II is more British because it was made in the UK (correct me if i am wrong)
yes
if they add it in the next update France mains will continue crying saying copy paste
as for the skink i dont care much its a mid to bad spaa, i have it in both USA and UK TT, they add it because they were lazy to find or model other spaa for that place so they just put the skink
if it really happens, I understand their reaction, but I might be sad about that. Well, to me, I might be happy if we get M24 Chaffee, P-51 Mustangs with Merlin, or Sherman V since we used those.
I was literally hyped we finally got outdated overdue Washington B.1, except the problem that B-29 sucks in Air Realistics for years.
I am not disaproving addition of C&P itself, I am frustrated the way how Gaijin uses it.
We historically used them, then why not?
and if those can grant extra gameplay style that cannot be achieved from older vehicles that we had, even better.
Forced Skink trade agreement from Gaijin
-Britain gets Ram II (which we had more connection than americans, and legitimately should’ve been in UK TT)
-Americans get Skink(which they had no connection with themselves, and eventually led into extra premium Skink on US TT via WW2-themed package)
-Americans getting skink won’t affect the addition of T77E1 in the same update.
whole trade was frustrating, except for the part that we got Ram II
:(
Because C&P-ing skink was one of the few C&P additions that shouldn’t have happened at all if we consider historic features. :/
should i get it? i am between the Ram II the P-47(USSR) and Talisman for a random tier 5 plane or tank (keep in mind i am rank 4 in UK so it will not help me in my grind the same with the p47
Right, forgot about that fact, it took the US getting a vehclie is has no relation to for one of the 3 operators (Canada, UK, Netherlands) to get it. Another reason not to like the Skink in the US tree. That trade shouldn’t have been needed.
Sadly, Gaijin believes the US order for Ram tanks wasn’t cancelled before they got some, by the incorrect name.
So when it comes to not making a premium the ONLY way to access a “historically important” vehicle or new weapon system, wanna talk about the F-14D? The “Super Tomcat” was historically important as not only is it the most widely recognized F-14 variant (since it is THE Top Gun plane.) but it also made major improvements to both the engines and the radar. Not only this but in the game the F-14D gets access to the AIM-54C+. This missile is not just “another variant of the phoenix missile” it is a full on upgrade and a half of the AIM-54C. As stated on the navy’s official aviation website: “AIM-54C+ High Power Phoenix-
Improved variant developed by Hughes for F-14D. Contains internal heaters, which eliminates need for temperature conditioning liquid, high-power Traveling Wave Tube (TWT) transmitter adapted from the AIM-120 AMRAAM, and low-sidelobe antenna. Latest version of RPM substitutes 6 ultra-high-speed computer chips for 45 of earlier, less-capable chips. Full-scale development began in August 1987. First test flight of fully upgraded missile on 14 August 1990 scored a direct hit on a QF-4 drone.” - (https://www.navair.navy.mil/node/12701) the AIM-54C+ not only has more processing power, but internal heaters that help the missile especially in high altitudes, and a higher power radar from the AIM-120. Considering the following I believe it is safe to say the AIM-54C+ is not just way better than the AIM-54C, but a new whole weapons system in general. Do you see what I see? That seems to go against your previous statement of “Our current approach at the high ranks is generally to make premium vehicles useful for progression without making them the only way to access a unique capability, weapon system, or a historically significant vehicle.” I would recommend adding the F-14D to the tech tree because of this.
There was a plan to switch the Ram IIs to the OQF 75mm gun like much of the British tanks do to capability with US ammo. Exactly how many was converted during the War and their service history is unknown, however all post war service examples did use the OQF 75mm as that’s the only type the Dutch had.
And this can be seen clear as day with the suggestions for them:
Oh mate, that is completely incorrect.
That is a straight example of ‘myth by Gaijin’.
Imagine that we literally left things at Dunkirk and Americans gave ammunition for 75mm M2/M3 that can also be used in OQF 75mm
Do you really think that we dump the APHE version of M61 APCBC into Dover offshore and illogically captivated to use Solid shot version of M61 APCBC only?
You can find proofs that we used those in the discussion thread about that
It is not us who didn’t use APHE
It is Gaijin that didn’t give us APHE
“OH TECH TREE UNIQUENESS IS IMPORTANT AND 17/20PDR DOESN’T HAVE APHE, SO- Remove APHE from OQF 75mm and only keeping those in Sherman II and Churchill NA75 that uses 75mm M3.”
it was done on occasion, as APHE didnt really give much benefit over a solid shot shell, and thats if the fuse even worked (aphe fuses were notoriously unreliable) but we still very much used the APHE in our QF75mms and m3 75mms.
“APHE shells for tank guns, although used by most forces of this period, were not used by the British. The only British APHE projectile for tank use in this period was the Shell AP, Mk1 for the 2 pdr anti-tank gun and this was dropped as it was found that the fuze tended to separate from the body during penetration.”
Since the british evaluations of APHE were poor, it makes sense that, when the british used M61 and other aphe rounds, the he filler was removed just due to how expensive the explosive fillers were.