Duplicate Vehicles: Why We Add Them

dont forget the US spaa gap

and the chinese tree doesnt need the abrams and apache and they got it, only reason the thai subtree didnt get the VT4 was because chinese players threw a fit

4 Likes

To be fair every nation has far more vehicles they operate that aren’t in game than the other way around. There’s simply so many vehicles that it will take decades worth of updates before any nation will truly be complete, if the game even lives long enough to see it.

Maybe Luxembourg with their 2 (or 3 I don’t remember) vehicles that can be added.

Still I want to see the Thai VT-4, right now the Oplot-T can’t make a proper Thai lineup at all because the only other Thai vehicle at the BR is the F-5TH. The VT-4 and other Thai vehicles like a VN-1C or VL MICA SAM would be really nice to see for that.

2 Likes

Every update You give this chorus and every update We get copy-pasted slop

16 Likes

Another aspect: AMX-30C2 is externally the same as AMX-30B2, which is in the game for 8 years. I guess the internal problems went on for 8 years so that the vehicle needed to be replaced by a Leopard 1A5 copy, which was introduced in 2020

1 Like

China literly doesn’t care if you remove taiwan vehicles.

If you got problem with taiwan itself. Better take it else

way too OP to ever be added :P

1 Like

Fourth vehicle gonna be sherman

Other nations get their tanks in one lineup, it’s not fair to force people to play multiple nations just to get one single nations equipment. Preventing that is the whole point of subtrees.

The nation paid for the tanks, they own them.

12 Likes

Duplicate Premiums are fine, and even more than fine, as they don’t cut off unique content. Playerbase is just frustrated with some more pressing issues, like the punishing grind of the game, which then spills negative sentiment with any other decision Gaijin makes, good or bad. That is what I think.

P.S. Gaijin bad

5 Likes

They are quite entitled and hypocritical. Thailand actually operates the VT-4 in active service (even though there was that incident where 2 gun barrels broke and the manufacturer blamed it on user error). It’s ridiculous how they gatekeep a real, operational vehicle from being added to another tree, yet they stay completely quiet when Gaijin adds fake or paper vehicles that never even saw service to the CN tree. So entitled.

5 Likes

Really? Do you know how different the radar is?

so… after the maidens thing… that are fictional and had nowhere to stand… and are just copies of tanks on top tier… that you said that you will not push top tier vehicles…as the prices are too much… many people can get for 79.99 and in a promo for less the GTA6…
you should bring back the Panther 2 … 341 coelien… the 10.5KWK tiger 2… and what ever paper vehicle removed… cause at that point the game is NOT historical as you want to believe…
the same time you have to consider something else… you dropped the T55E2 as a premium… so the Next T55E1 should be in the main tree… you took the stabilizer of the t25 and you dont even care to change the model… cause that particular model you have in game is the one with the stabilizer…
many tanks have inaccuracies… that is just helpful for you … there are models that are not accurate… and had more… and you just let them out…
the airplanes are not working as they should… as the BV155 should not be that maneuverable as a zero for example.
the armor on the soviet tanks is a joke…
the US 75 that is on 5.7 is a JOKE .
the US 90 mil cant pen anything by the game logic… in reality could do more.
the angle pen of the Russian shells… unreal…
the overpowered BMPTs both… that have 1000 armor on one spot.
the ERA on soviet tanks that works like a repellent for the apcbc… and react …
now as the friend above told… the naval… is bad… really bad… the aiming is bad… the waves are bad… the maps are bad… in the blue water… before you even get in game you get shell shower… from the other spawn…
the spawns on the tanks maps… are pathetic… teams get spawn camped… every single match… people that want to play … get discouraged… from that… there are maps that someone can shot from mid map to the spawn…
instead to introduce something so we don’t have the spawn camping phenomenon… you let it be…
like if you shot at the spawn you shot ghost shells or your tank explodes…
make the game fun again… not a big grind …
make the prices of the vehicles at logical meters… in that economy (global) to push higher prices…? instead to lower… lower prices means more at your bank… higher prices… less…
drop of the maiden thing… pay and get the rights for the girls un panzer… will be more enjoyable. .and more… real… colab instead to make something from the AI … and slop to the people…i dont understand to the biggest game in the grene… to don’t or don’t want to do a collab… something that people love… and you prefer to home brew something… like that. and ask for 80$…
you asked for a subscription… with the premium acc… ok…many people get it… you have to push hard to pay to play tanks…? i dont see future in that way…
or you have to push behind pay walls the most anticipated airplanes?
what is the logic behind that…? to milk the people out???
have you played the game lately???
or drop things that people will get…
the worst thing is instead to stop new players for rush on top tiers… you push them…
why is that bad… is cause people cant play those brs for the 1 tank players…
now days the phenomenon is from 1.0 to all brs…

me pesonaly i want to play something higher than the 9.3 but i cant…
cause of the abusive soviet tanks… that have super armor… and amazing shells… the overpowered 2s38 bmpts…
and the phenomenon of the 1 br higher… i get on games 9 of the 10 are ultiers 1 br up the same time at all brs… i play … there are plenty of players at the same … 5.7… for example… or 9.3 … why we should suffer for that? we can wait 10 or 20 seconds…
another subject the event vehicle every single month… is not worth… to do … is choking for the people…

3 Likes

What’s the position of gaijin about joint programs that don’t end in a country buying the end product? (example the x country paid the 10% of a program but in the end they didnt buy or trial the vehicle)

1 Like

Regarding the VT-4 that upset the CN community:

They are quite entitled. During the Thai-Cambodian clashes, Thailand actually used the VT-4 effectively (even though there was that incident where 2 gun barrels broke and the manufacturer blamed it on user error). They refuse to let a real, active-service vehicle be added to another tree, but when the game adds vehicles that they never actually had in service to their own tree, they stay completely quiet. It’s just so entitled.

5 Likes

F-18 is actually good

F-16 is actually good

…From Switzerland and Australia respectively, and there were a lot of players looking forward to these. I’m also hoping we get a Swiss F-18 with AIM-9P-5.

1 Like

the amount of people that have buy the premium F-18 speak for itself

I’m fine with copy paste. If a nation used something, just add it and I’m happy.

1 Like

Bro, it’s time.

Yeah, who the hell wants another crappy Tornado? That thing sucks.