And yet Gaijin bothered themselves to add 360 launch and GNSS to the guidance kit, which all it does is reduces inertial guidance drift.
C7 is present for like half a year in game, used by SLAMRAAM/CLAWS and soon NASAMS, still copypaste of C5.
And yet Gaijin bothered themselves to add 360 launch and GNSS to the guidance kit, which all it does is reduces inertial guidance drift.
C7 is present for like half a year in game, used by SLAMRAAM/CLAWS and soon NASAMS, still copypaste of C5.
Its almost like instead of actually adding the missiles, the snail is just gimping them for no reason. We have several sources about the C-5’s hobs capability, we have sources for the longer engine. On top of that the aim120d got an even longer engine. The fact that they’re copy paste is dumb and just proves the snail is either maliciously nerfing them, or just completely incompetent.
Yes, they are keeping them in line to preserve current status quo of gameplay loop. Same with BUK or other fancy SAMs, being equally easy to notch as your average AMRAAM.
The Stealth of the F22, F35, J20 and Su57 will be Multiple times better then the Night Hawk! There Stealth will be able to Spoof the Best AESAs we have at ranges that will let them start shooting FIRST!!! If you think the 5th Gen Stealth will not be good you are kidding your self…will it be undetectable at 20km NO…but put AIM-120D on an F22 and put it at 50km…YOUR IN BIG TRUBLE!!! Also to note…the maps NEED to be much bigger for those missiles…soooooo these 5th Gens are going to sneak up on a lot of people for sure!
reminder that CAPTOR-E MK0 can detect and Engage an F-35 from 64km according to South Korean Airforce Trials
so no, I have no reason to believe 5th gen Stealth will be superior to F-117 Stealth
because it isn’t, F-35, F-22 and Su-57 all have a Larger RCS than the F-117
Please tell me you’re joking
Prove me wrong
go ahead
Can you provide the source to this?
That’s an unfair question to ask. While I do agree that stealth implementation will be butchered in the future. Asking for RCS values is impossible because it’s all classified. You can make educated guess. What we know is factual is that the F-22 uses more advanced stealth technologies compared to the F-117 nighthawk. They were both designed in different eras (roughly 20 years difference). So assuming the F-117 is stealthier then the F-22 is a bad guess. Some technologies the rapport uses that the night hawk does not are continues curvature stealth shaping, multi layer and new RAM, edge allotment across entire aircraft, S- shaped serpentine interest +radar blockers, low observable engine nozzles, embedded antennas and conformal sensors, all aspect stealth design, signatures management during maneuvering, and EW.
All of them will have larger RCS if ignore RAM
But with it 22&35 will be better
should be added to block III upgrade and not block II
250 is perhaps te least range it could have, there are quite a ton of numbers on it and 250 is the smallest you’ll see.

Mind you the top speed wil bee SIGNIFICANTLY affected byt the high altitude launch conditions. sure it might loose the booster but the gains from a high altitude launch scenario make up for it in spades.
True! 120Cs were actually neat in their dev server before being nerfed into the ground after those who didn’t want a competition invaded the Forums and social media begging for nerfs.
Maybe it’s about time to remove those nerfs…
Yes, the strength of 120c should be restored, and now monsters like Su 30sm2 have been born.
Is it technically possible for a block2 super hornet to operate AIM174?
Yes. It’s not restricted to a single Block like I’ve said earlier.
Delta-V of AIM-174 would be worse that Fakour i suppose
How? the fakour is based off of hawk which has a range of 25-50 miles. The aim174 is based off of SM6 which has a range of 150 miles minimum.
fakour is a reverse engineer of the aim-54 pheonix.