Do you support giving dedicated strike aircraft a more distinct gameplay role when they coexist with multirole fighters?

Game Discussion General Discussion
,
1
  • Yes
  • No
  • Unsure
0 voters
2

2 answers for yes?

3

It has been corrected.

1 Like
4

I think strike aircraft are kinda mid with things like su-30 carrying the best CAS and much faster strike aircraft def need a update

1 Like
5

Hello, fellow warriors. I’m planning to submit an article on top-tier fighter and attack aircraft, but please let me know what you think first.

6

and f15E is still sort of a strike aircraft same with Su-30s but a-10 def isn’t as cool as It should be rn speed difference is miles apart climb rate and height Ceilings are what’s brutally cooking strike aircraft rn
and the amount of weapons being able to be carried is also massive some modern bombs might share this same issue B1B lancer will be one of the ones that might be able to do cas or carpet bombing

7

There are pleny of other threads of this topic, this brings nothing new to the table.

9

The lack of gameplay for these aircraft, especially when assets exist from the Deep Strike and Nuclear Thunder events is just stupid. Its pretty obvious its lazyness and not a game limitation at this point.

Heck, the total and complete lack of ANY SEAD targets in ARB to actually use ARM against is just insane to me. Let alone adding proper SEAD objectives to ASB

10

Strike aircraft should be cheaper to spawn than fighters with cas armaments in grb
There is currently 0 reason to use any of them over fighters

11