i agree
2 Likes
I completely agree. If gaijin cannot correct this, please do not continue to release new tanks. Gaijin should first implement the bugs and suggestions raised by each player, rather than constantly stuffing new tanks into the already bloated technology tree.
6 Likes
That is what we want the ZTZ99A and WZ1001(E) changed to be. Thanks for this issue, and hope it will be adapted soon in the game.
4 Likes
FY-1D1 problem at the top of 99A tank plus
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/HukdcOMC2YkE
2 Likes
When can we see this in the game? For gaijin, it’s just a matter of creating a text, but the efficiency is so low
New APFSDS DTC-10E/S should be added into Chinese MBT // Gaijin.net // Issues
4 Likes
Never you will see badly modeled Russian tanks or reports on them in the game. Developers would have a sudden urge to accidentally fall out of the window .
When it comes to non-Russian stuff in the game. It’s just badly modeled most of the time and frankly they don’t care as it seems .
5 Likes
They really just need to fix the turret ring which was bug reported and acknowledged.
我认为他说得很有道理，gaijin应该认真客观的去看，毕竟这可是一款史实载具对战游戏，模型上的错误理应纠正
2 Likes
new issues :
BUG occurred in ERP data at the top of turret 99A
BUG occurred in ERP data at the top of turret 99A. // Gaijin.net // Issues
I love the detailed explanations you made to save 99A, however I remain pessimistic on whether Gaijin will adopt these changes. Even if they do, the reload time and the DTC10 will still be left unfixed. They’re arrogant and stubborn.
The Chinese top tier MBTs have been suffering from many historical inaccuracies thanks to a variety of causes, the way how Gaijin accepts/ignores evidence submitted by us being heart of the problem.
The moderators have been requesting accurate data from issue submitters, which we all know is impossible given how PLA keeps pretty much everything confidential. This gives Gaijin a “righteous” reason to reject both issues citing a relatively unreliable source, and issues containing files they render as “classified”.
Meanwhile, they never requested evidence proving that there exists a loader who’s able to maintain a 5s reload time, when they decided to buff Abrams. Why? Because USA top tiers are at a 40-% win rate, and they need newbies to buy click-bait.
The only way to let Gaijin acknowledge their fault is to organize a massive protest. No matter what they think about the issues you post, it’s the money that they’re ultimately responsible to.
Let them know the urgency of the matter, and they’ll offer us a minimized lower frontal plate, a 6s reload, a real DTC10, and maybe even FY2s on the side of the VT4. It’s them who will be looking for documents themselves, not us.
15 Likes
支持，中系问题太多了。
4 Likes
Keep up the visibility. Keep posting everyday to keep this topic on top.
1 Like
哈哈哈哈，确实，还使劲出新车恶心人
我多希望他们不出新的东西
1 Like
We don’t want to spend a penny on China’s tech tree until we are treated fairly
2 Likes
My suggestion is: delete the Chinese tech tree, so that all the problems can be solved at once
3 Likes
Nice research, thank you for your effort.
what do you mean
agree with
1 Like
Well done bro, this must have taken a lot of research, and hopefully Gaijin will be able to see the evidence and improve this glaring error, and I don’t think it’s difficult for a big company like Gaijin to do that.
2 Likes