Wait, why are they even the same BR?
Finnish one is slightly heavier and doesn’t have a launcher
Also i like how the stats mention says 20/20/20 on the turret armor but the side is 6mm and the rear is 10mm + 4mm boxes
A light breeze will penetrate that turret
Edit:
Think i figured it out, 2MD got thermals
The BMP-2MD has worse armor all around even with the add on “armor” then you have 1 belt of apds. Again i would rather take the missile launcher and same amount of apds while being more armored, lighter weight and thermals aren’t that useful if you cant hurt vehicles unless you’re on the side, again the BMP-2MD imo was a worthless addition if it is going to stay exactly as it is now.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/JqAufWufggDk
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/DysPx28Zfyi3
Both BMP^ bug reports
Again, why does gaijin find C&P so hard, i mean they still haven’t even acknowledged the KV-1A having worse armor than the light KV-1C turret despite the C overperforming armor wise. Or the Finnish Sotka’s weighing .2t more than all other T34’s despite not having the add on armor or the fuel barrels or front hull track armor. Or front track guards.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/9n0eoHep9yVB
Finnish Sotka^ bug report about the weight.
IR missile? What’s the specs?
How?
How did they downgrade the armor?
Gaijin majick, just like the KV-1A having less armor than the light turret found on the KV-1C lol. Idk how the heavy KV-1 turret has worse armor but standard gaijin documents i guess.
Again its simple, remove the BMP-2MD and just add the original BMP-2 that finland had with missiles then they dont have to fix the armor and can C&P it. Though it would probably weigh 8t more and have 50 apds and 1 belt of HE rounds as its only ammo.
With IRCCM and said to have a similar warhead to the french 530 missiles by mid 1970s
That’s dope asf
No idea how it does IRCCM and its actual ability to turn and track but its cool to think about
Saw this dope thing, called the Bofors BUSTER, essentially Sweden tried a similar design to the LOSAT, but didn’t get past the drawing board;
It has, and even passed to the developers as of December 2023.
Here, an oddity I first recall posted by CaID on the old forum. It is brought to you by Panssarikolonna, a paintball and tank driving experience center in Finland that unfortunately closed in early 2023.
They have coined this vehicle “Projekti T-62”, with the simple goal of “creating a wagon that has never been seen before on Finnish soil.” Comparisons can be drawn to the child of a mad scientist, as this T-62 mounts no conventional turret, but rather, the vz. 53/59 twin 30mm anti-aircraft system found on the M53/59 Praga.
Unfortunately, due to the recreational intentions and deactivated armaments, there is pretty much zero chance this thing ever makes it to the game, but I thought it was worth sharing because it combines real military-grade components as opposed to a mockup.
Apparently in the files too sadly.
Greetings friends, does anyone know about this ATGM vehicle from Kværner?
Edit: Solved!
Oh, that might be. I thought it looked like a Sisu
Oh wow those are similar lol XD I think you are on a more right track than i was. It looks more like a Sisu than the one i linked due to the angle of the front and the number of wheels.
Ain’t that just the XA-180 TOW?
Yup, that would be it. Silly me skipped straight to the AMV in the fisrt post.
Thank you!
BA-10M suggestion is finally done. Up-armored T-26 is still pending.
