If the spice 2000s can be mounted on 4 and 6, then it makes no sense from an avionic targeting plug in perspective that the 250s in a multirack cannot go on those hard points. Usually the limitation is weight bare or electronic targeting access, which the mounting of 2000s on those hard points proves its possible.
Where is it going to be in the tech tree? After which F-16?
Attack the D point!
beneath the f16d
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/XAPxiqu6fhGF
Python-4 Report done guys go give it some love!!!
@BasherBenDawg8 you can update the list with this new report we just need to wait for an answer now.
3 Likes
i mean it clearly says “The developers are not currently planning these missiles.”, so its obvious why it was denied.
9 Likes
Can someone post the modification page?
Aim-9L? Are you serious now?
F in the chat, i know. Im waiting on todays update, see what it will bring. Still optimistic.
Be thankful its not Aim-9P like on baraks before
1 Like
thx
I read to put the derby s like the others
(Buff) Report for missing LITENING G4 Targeting pod:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/AtvU0a1enTl2
Netz actually, Baraks don’t get the 9P, they start with the 9L as well.
As to be expected really, we’ll just have to wait for the missile to be added for aircraft before we report it again.
What I’m more concerned about is your poor PC and the sheer amount of tabs open…
1 Like
I mean, it’s historically accurate lmao
yeah they got aim-9p removed not that long a go. And yes, they were starting with 9L preset but in order to get more additional 9Ls you had to go through 9P modification XD
