Preach the truth brother!
2 Likes
Don’t forget that Leopard turret was floating above the hull for years and could be penned by everything.
Abrams/Leopard/Leclerc cross-sections armour produce more spall than main armour itself while fuel tanks on T tanks soak 600mm rod with ease.
Magic ERA that works struck even 90 degress.
Non anti era shells for western.
SU-25K, 2S38, KA-52 and Turms spam with 11.0 shell and gen 2 thermals.
3BM42 in every T tank that they have while Abrams still doesn’t have M833 and Leopard 2A4 without better hull nor DM33.
Now T-90M with spallliner from 2077. Ehh I came back from a long pause from WT but bias is still there haha
That is interesting actually
5 Likes
The f16 c in game is from the 2000s as well due to the hms
We are getting in this update the challenger 3 and 2a7, we also aready had just as “modern” tanks like type10
They have alredy stated that other tanks will recive spall liners
Was a bug from the dev server, was already fixed btw.
Just gonna highlight the state of the chally 2 as an example of double standards.
1 Like
It was decided that reports regarding spall liners will have less requirements for now, videos are valid in this case.
It is the same treatment for every tank, other reports with this kind of sources about spall liners are also being forwarded.
The developers will decide after reviewing the reports
4 Likes
Yeah, so what? He closed one topic about russian tank, because the proof was a video (even tho it was about different version).
And then interfleet accepted another bug report with only video as a source, also regarding T90M.
Even tho the video itself was from ROSOBORONEXPORT. Who do you want to fool?
We are looking at your hands alll the time.
So firstly you need to BE CONSISTENT IN YOUR ACTIONS.
You as a company added Yak141 in WHAT IF configuration, then you need to do the same with Mirage 4000.
You need to be consistent in submitted bug reports, and let other people talk in them, because right now you are closing it under a minute sometimes (especially that ZZ guy).
This one picture does not prove anything.
4 Likes
Ok , but quick explanation how does that work with a video from 9 years ago, from not even an official production vehicle?
Please read what I said, the bug was closed because the video has issues not for being a video.
Is just an update on the bug report.
What do you mean?
1 Like
We are happy that you will accept bug reports about spall liners with different approach, as most of those spall liners are either skipped or simply classified still (Sepv2 has everything about it’s armor classified).
You should be more open about it tho. Noone who didn’t read this comment of yours will know about that.
Also, for my understanding current build of the game does not have any spall liners right?
So why i can see big block around the T80BVM carousel lighting up in penetration, when i clearly didn’t touch any of those rails, purely hit in between of them and still there clearly is extra protection for the ammo.
3 Likes
Here you have description what’s going on. This is Russian bias.
9 Likes
TrickZZter himseld stated that the submited video was from 9 Years ago, but the T-90M is a different version of the tank. The T-90M video that was shown in the video might have been a prototype and in the end it never has been implemented in that way for the 2020 version of the T-90M
1 Like
When you shot at T90A another funny thing happens, ammorack acts like with extra protection and also in its whole volume is still acting on the penetrating jet.
1 Like
Turms also has this:
BUT NON OF IT IS HAPPENING ON T72B3 :D
So if T72B3 does not have it, it means that other models GOT THE ARTIFICIAL EXTRA PROTECTION TO BE BETTER THAN ACTUALLY ARE.
This is just sad.
3 Likes
Yes I agree, that is why Im posting it here with the hope more people sees it.
I think what you are seeing is the carrousel protection.
If you shoot at the driver from the side there is no such extra protection like the T-90M does with the spall liner.
There is no information in game that it has carousel protection. How much is this protection? 20mm? 200mm? 2000mm?
T72A Turms has it, T90A has it, but T72B3 does not?
It was one of those “balancing reasons” i believe. You just didn’t think that anyone will notice.
Also, carousel protection is outside of the carousel, not through the whole volume of it.
5 Likes
Oh, okay, my mistake. It sometimes does not light up when you are penetrating bottom side of the hull.
Anyway, this doesn’t affect my main point.
I can’t add more to the subject, I also hope we get spall liners on the mbts that had them.
3 Likes
Spall liner = carousel protection or spall liner =/= carousel protection?
Lack of consistency is killing me right now.
2 Likes