UK already has a C2A1 equivalent tank, and it’ll get more.
UK already has Stuart equivalent tanks.
Canada is not the UK.
Britain has one of the best tech trees, and I should know having played it for so long.
The only major complaint I ever felt was that APDS should be removed from Falcon and it dropped in BR.
Of course there are countless minor complaints about bugs for British vehicles, and that goes with all 9 tech trees in War Thunder.
@林登总司令命令往下传
AIM, Hunter, Class are all not tech tree vehicles, on top of Britain already having domestic equivalents to each one. Your post is a false equivalence fallacy.
Sweden is a tech tree in War Thunder, as is Hungary.
India is not Russia as you falsely claim.
Mig-21 Bison is pretty unneeded considering its a worse MiG-21-93.
Bhishma while not being unique to other T-90S shouldnt be added to USSR, they could add T-90S as a mod to T-90A as some T-90A lost Shtora dazzlers
What do you mean?
The user i responded to said that they had to use a rank 2 vehicle all the way to BR 7.0, so i pointed out that the devblog mentions the skink being added as well.
@Jarms
If it is exciting or not doesn’t matter to the point i was trying to make.
That’s… that’s not what historical accuracy means.
Do you think we’re larping as militaries? Cause we’ve never been larping as militaries…
And that’s an entirely separate subject.
Let’s just have one combined tree then, ay? No need for nations and historical vehicles used by those nations.
US didn’t build, use, or want Skink. The Canadians fought under British Commonwealth forces. The 2nd Canadian Armoured Brigade which used the Skink in combat was apart of the British Second Army.