In an ideal game, both would be TT or squadron
Sorry, I had to say it out loud, got overwhelmed by complete insanity
ah yes the T-34 (x6) lineup
2 Likes
Something bad is going to happen it seems
1 Like
Stabz + Smoke back system at 5.7 ??? LOL no, 6.3 minimun.
1 Like
So you pre-announced stabbed t-34 just to steal space from “community responds”
1 Like
Cool, cool… any improvements to the mobility? Also, let this be 6.0🙏
T-44MS next? T-44MS (1964): Updating the outdated
6 Likes
First two devblogs actually being two tanks and not the of starting dev season with the usual shopping cart with a 30mm strapped to it
10 Likes
Will it have a forehead verticle drive weakspot like the Superpersh due to the presence of the stabiliser there? or will it just be a forehead tumor?
1 Like
The last update was for wallet warriors. This update is for the broke.
It’s worse than the 76mm (Jumbo) Sherman so it should be 6.0.
3 Likes
Better gun. Better mobility. Better armour. Worse reload. Clearly should be 5.3
A T-34 having better armor than a Jumbo? Do you play the game?
No .50 cal and less than half the gun depression
5 Likes
yeah, likely.
Make it 6.0. 6.3 is already T-44 territory
Sorry did you say “it’s worse than the 76mm Jumbo” or did you say
Idk I forgot.
Which 76 sherman is 6.3? Jumbo.
Meant to say Jumbo Sherman in the initial post. I’ll correct it now.
Which 76 Sherman isn’t 6.3? A1, A2, A3. 5.0, 5.3, 5.7.
Yes but the obvious comparison is going to be the one at the same BR you mentioned. If I meant “worse than the M4A3 76” I would have said 5.3 not 6.0.