[Development] 2S19M1 and 2S19M2: Vengeance Is Mine!

When AS-90

1 Like

Any clue on the planned BR?

1 Like

IS-2 engine first made playstyle?

SPG kinda require good reverse to be good because they’re big and slow and unarmored

I mean, it’s a T-72 hull tbf, it’s another case of Leopard 2 Marksman.

T-72 hull but removed armor

What are the stats on the APHEBC round, will it be high velocity?

Half of the Thai sub-tree is unique vehicles.
Your post is implying M4A3E8 is copy-paste of M4. “Just a slightly altered model bro.”
Those arguments are beyond pedantic.

Also that means you count all SPAA additions Soviets got as copy-paste.

1 Like

Not to mention I’m excited to see that external autoloading animation.

These two 2S19 feel worse than the 2S3M

1 Like

-4 km/h, god dammit.

Should be a 7.5 second reload, much higher velocity, and better mobility. May be missing a few things too.

1 Like

6*

1 Like

Too much ammo in the turret. Frontal armor thickness is 20 mm. It might as well have taken the 2S3M auto-loader and put it on 6.7+

Double barrel Msta-S

And to cap off artillery with the 2S35 Koalitsiya-SV
IMG_8863

4 Likes

I always thought these where heavily armored, i never did any research on them but from pictures i assumed it was a t72 chasis with a howitzer turret placed on top.

Ah yes, for when you need to double penetrate the enemy. Is it a prorotype or in service?

service

I love seeing late cold war SPGs in my ww2 tank keep it up guys this is definitely not problematic for the game or anything

4 Likes

Sometimes you just need to make sure.