they dig the grave even more with the addition of turret buckets and more modules
Hopfully Gaijin can better communicate their requirments for the Abrams, especially under the circumstances about its classifications.
I’ll be waiting
2 Likes
They should just correct the regular C instead. Difference between C and C+ would not be reflected in game unless ECM gets modelled.
2 Likes
Honestly it shouldn’t even be just the Abrams, it should be any modern vehicles. How is anyone going to bug report the Leopard 2A7V, 2A8, Strv 123, Merkava Mk.4/5 and so on when all these vehicles are so modern? And also Israeli vehicles especially since the OPSEC of their equipments is exceptionally high.
9 Likes
Exist another Puma need changes aswell.
2 Likes
I fully agree and support corrections to the existing Phoenix missiles. All variants, but especially the current C model that many people have shown evidence/proof that it is under-performing compared to the A and/or B models.
I am not deadset on having just the premium F-14D be the “improved/best” variant. I want to play my “full” F-14 lineup, and I want all of our Tomcats to perform to their maximum potential 🙂
I have the IRIAF already (still need to spade the rest of the Tomcats, lol), I am very much looking forward to playing through each of the Tomcats in a match (Arcade obviously) and/or future “Nuke Thunder” type events where we can use our full lineups instead of just one vehicle.
1 Like
Thank you so much for this change. Chile has 36 of these F-16s that the Netherlands sold us, so it’s great to be able to play with the F-16 that my country has, even if it’s in Dutch service.
PS: Could you add the historical Chilean camouflage of this Dutch F-16 since we operate the exact same one?
even with that special camouflage that has this distinctive mark when they sent the second batch of these planes to Chile
4 Likes
I can’t say I don’t agree.
Any classified vehicle will have specifications that won’t be accessable and thus won’t reflect in the game as accurately.
And I’d like to help out in any other research regarding classified vehicles if it means getting the vehciles their accurate armor/specifications
1 Like
F16AM prem got acknowledge but the mig29 family is still rotting and burning lmao
thats cool i guess
but mig29 r73 and r27er remove when ?
I don’t get it, why bother with all these different names if they’re identical? It just causes confusion. Missiles like the PL-7 being 100% the same as a magic 1 but called something completely different is not the best either IMO. When it’s the same exact missile/bomb etc. as something else but called different, it should just say “PL-7 (Magic 1)” so it’s easier to know what copy paste it is
1 Like
I mean they should fix AIM-54C and C+ which would benefit both F-14B and F-14D. AIM-54A seems to be more or less correct in its performance and features but C and C+ should still receive couple major improvements.
2 Likes
@Smin1080p_WT I want to add one more thing to the whole “Abrams” thing, and it should not just be locked to the Abrams specifically. ALL and ANY modern vehicles and weaponry* should NEVER be forced to require concrete values to make bug reports. The devs knows this and it is a massive national security that despite knowing this, we are STILL required to bug report with concrete evidence to even remotely get things fixed. What are the devs going to do when the F-22, F-35 and Su-57 eventually gets added? Are we going to bug report base off concrete evidences as well? Or are the devs going to start accepting rough estimates and educated guesses instead?
10 Likes
Also if UK is getting nerfed with turret baskets, can we start implementing the same system to russian MBT’s please?? Playing the abrams the past few months have been very frustrating when someone barely aims at me, yet completely takes out my turret because they hit the very bottom corner of the enormous basket…
4 Likes
hi 1080p，i wonder is the Dutch F16-AM gonna be a preorder or not
Thats what they were called by the Chinese tho… in their official documentation.
11 Likes
Yes, and I’m saying it should say (magic 1) after its name so it’s easier to know what it actually is. I’ve got 8k hours on steam and I’m still having to double check by googling names of missiles and stuff, it’s just unecessary how many copy pastes there are that seem like they’re different. the new phoenixes being called C+ when they’re literally the exact same game wise is prime example of that
F-14D TO TECH TREE
F-14D TO TECH TREE
F-14D TO TECH TREE
Good avoidance there with this advertisement post.
“We listened you and copy pasted the same missile with a different name, same aircraft with a different skin”…
9 Likes
Hopefully you’ll finally mention the leopard 2a7V (and leopard in general) modeling issues too
1 Like
My guy it is just a F14B, except the the Radar