With all due respect, France has vehicles like the Mirage 2000 variants that are sufficient to meet those requirements and are actually domestic designs.
Part of what makes this game so interesting is the unique feel of each tree, and A majority of BeNeLux additions have actively undermined that for the French tree. Furthermore, given that pack premiums show up very often in matches due to their ease of access, it further homogenizes games as we will more and more Dutch leopards 2a4’s and (now) Dutch F-16AMs instead of French designs.
I, like many players, don’t agree that the F-16AM is the ideal choice for the flagship French pack premium, and it makes the tree feel like an after thought reserved for the leftovers of other trees.
Clear example that all subtrees except south africa are a reason to easily dump coğy paste while ignoring or in this case, misplacing original vehicles. If they ever drop
Give them MICA and they would instantly be 14.0 and too high of a BR to be premiums, don’t give them MICA and they will be in the 12.3 area which isn’t a kind BR range.
With the Abrams being next weeks’ topic, can you guys revise T-90M (Arena-M)? It’s a T-90M sidegrade with no 4S24 bags instead an active protection system. Folding this variant with the current vehicle and if in the best case scenario making the Arena-M active protection system an modification alongside the additional explosive reactive armor would be much very welcome.
Also, an clarification regarding Yak-130 could help the players understand the massive capability gap between Yak-130 and its italian sibling M-356FA simply denying its air combat capability is unfair in my opinion and if Yak-130M is being considered for the short-term future, since both missiles and countermeasure pods are not present in the Dev Server vehicle but was been shown of these modules being present in the file vehicle.
I’m really surprised and pleased to see that you guys actually took my suggestion into account! I’m genuinely happy that modern Dutch aviation is finally being represented in the game. Thank you so much for taking my suggestion in consideration for making this change.
this suggestion is pretty much the forum’s “Bad Apple” or “Doom”, if it can be linked back to the Nation Folders, it will be linked back to the nation folders
No update on the Artevelde/Lorelei? It’s quite important to the Belgians and I think the rule about the same ship not appearing twice is a bad rule, especially for smaller nations.
Jean Bart is also a mistake imo, you should have used Clemenceau for the premium but it’s too late now since it also became a pre-order so people already bought it.
Well, as someone who primarily plays ground, I have more stake in the Leo 1A5BE, but I so hope we see the Artevelde (Lorelei) in the France tree under Belgium.
The 1A5BE being moved is a minor organizational change that tickles a part of my brain; the Artevelde is a placement/oporator nation change that is a major victory, which would make me not have a major care about the Leo’s placement, if not getting it means we can get the Belgians one of their ships.
I don’t usually brag too much, but you guys should have taken a look at the great suggestions made by @Mathll , so many Mirages left to add that would have been way more original, and really fit the French tree.
Yeah, I still think it should be changed in position, but definitely not as major as a problem as a Belgian Flagship being bound permanently to the German Tech tree…
just still don’t agree that the m1a1 aussie abrams is squadron vehicle, i get it doesn’t change much but its not need as a squadron vehicle as we already have one for high tier, would fit better in tree after the vickers mk7
With the intent to force the F-14D to remain at parity with the F-14B is there any chance that the AXX-1 TCS of the F-14B will be implemented as a sensor, since the F-14D is getting access to the AAS-42 / AXX-1 combo EOTS / IRST blister under the nose modeled?
The report has been pending for a fair while now. And this would be the perfect time.
Yeah, Belgium really should get that ship. I wouldn’t mind if Gaijin simply stated that they’ll add the Belgian service version at a later date and let the Germans keep their modified version. That would at least satisfy the Belgian part of the community.
Even though this would technically break the “one refit of a single ship” rule, I think this is a justified exception. The Belgian version represents an important part of Belgium’s naval history, and adding it later would be a reasonable compromise.
