Yeah I understand, if you can make something better, i can be wonderfull
IO think it’s more of a contrail. The video you think about was filmed during winter and with snow everywhere, this can explain it’s “smoke”
Well I can’t find the open source that announced the use of SP3 on the F4.1, I do have a source (classified) that announces its installation (I’m not going to give this source otherwise I’ll get into trouble).
Wht is SP 3 ??
This is the “pod” used for attaching the additional Mica missiles present from the Rafale F4.1
If someone have thoose magazines, ou know how to have access to them, they may be lot of infos on Rafale :
Hello i don’t know if i’m late but the cannon has been fixed
though there aren’t any shell selections at the time it has a 2500rpm fire rate and seems tto have the right velocity
Behold, Rafale now rips at 1458km/h lmao.
The flare are now single pop too
AND the MICA seems to be better at close range slow speed hobs
Damm that is a lot of things
So thats why i ripped my wings during turning today, good job gaijin…
I have the same impression for the Mica, it also seems to me that it vibrates less once it is launched.
Well it was reported and corrected accordingly
what do you mean?
Nice, what a joke. Listing “No air brake.” as one of the features when they “could not implement it due to the complexity” Yeah Okay …
all they need to do is make the inward elevons pitch downwards :sob:
At least the Magic 2s have been confirmed
literally … wtf??
I was personally not too worried about that at all, would be fine without them but I am glad we got that done :)
Now I am expecting,
- Working AESA
- Proper HUD
- Proper MFDs
- ??? Airbrake ???
I agree, these points are currently the most important.
On the other hand it seems that the quantity of CM remains the same. And for the GBU there is no mention of the GBU-49, remains to be seen what will be done