Are we expecting a proper AESA radar? No way we are keeping PESA???
Because you really think they will ungimped the MICA ???
Reports have been made for months, and guess what ? it is still gimped.
5 Likes
we are expecting it
1 Like
Should be getting AESA, ye.
1 Like
Well i shorted the reason why it performs like that, youll find the reports on the dedicated MICA thread.
But like most of Thrust vectoring AAM, its a limitation.
Small change can be made to correct the other issue but it wont give us AIM120 range
Sweet guys. Appreciate all your efforts!
1 Like
RAFALE should be reclassed as F.2.2 because it makes no sense to have a F.3R without Meteor or Mica-IR.
I’m saying this, because i would prefer to grind an F.2 now and grind an F.3R when game would be ready.
2 Likes
Or just a F3.3
What changes specifically?
At the end we will just get the 6 mica with the same range, because they won’t correct them
is the hmd suppposed to lack symbology for queuing missiles / locked targets or is it just missing
F.2.2 because F.3.3 and F.3R are so close to each others that it makes no sense to add F.3R after F.3.3
Note that MICA-IR and AASM still are possible for F.2.2
Gaijin only adds aircrafts with Significant changes.
I wish to also have Rafale M F.1 after M4000
1 Like
The issue with you making these assumptions about my understanding is I’m significantly more familiar with this situation than you are. Currently, MICA’s range could be improved by A) introducing a ranging table to help reduce it bleeding energy excessively, B) tick rate could be increased which would resolve the vast majority of the wobble, and C) reducing the drag and improving the kinetic behaviours through tweaks to size and the aforementioned ranging table.
1 Like
If people put the effort they put into getting it ahistorical missile numbers it be a whole lot easier to get it ungimped.
This is the most bug reporting effort I’ve seen the community put into a French aircraft in a while, focus just a little bit of that on the MICA and it will be fixed too.
1 Like
It is supposed to have more range (some sources announce up to 100km range but Dassault, Thales and Safran do not give any information, there are only secondary sources), moreover the OST is supposed to be coupled to the radar/IRST and have a rangefinder to have the distance of the planes in front
3 Likes
Since the MICA are out, people here are trying everything possible to correct them, nothing has changed since 6 month
1 Like
The F2.2 would be good but the loss of the designation pod would still be a handicap.
1 Like
The same way Relaxed static stability is…
4-5 reports a month is a lot different than dozens a day
Then, i hope you made report about it.
I’m not pretending to be all knower about the mica, because i’m not, i’m just stating multiple facts.
You might surely be right, i hope so.