Going through the video a bit :
1:30 : The IRST can bu use to fire missiles. “everything is possible”, so no missiles are denied this possibility. It can detect multiple targets at once and track one target only
Spectra jammer and RWR
10:00 You can carry 2 scalp on each wings
12:05 MICA IR can. use datalink to follow radar cue until terminal vector
15:30 He specifically mentions that the AASM is for F4. He did not for the 8th missile pylon earlier ?
17:30 The IR variant is not used against moving targets. Rather, when it’s vertical, it will use object recognition to check it’s position using known GPS/satellite data to precisely hit its target
Well i hope they give more because IRCCM of missiles like AIM9M or AIM9L/I don’t ccare about size only if there is flare or not. Having more is better than having big.
Been defeating 9Ms on dev with 2 pops. It’s not the most countermeasures, but it honestly isn’t too bad. Was having a time of it until I bound different buttons to flare and chaff, but pretty okay now.
Do you have any documentation on the not-airbrake? It’s really quite a pain in the ass trying to drop from mach to launch AASM without one, but they rejected a report already. Currently trying to scour for launch parameters of AASM, but not having any luck so asking if we can try fix that aspect.
Only Rafale A had “physical” airbrakes. Production Rafale uses a combination of Canards and Flaps/Slats to slow down. It has already been reported, though I am currently not aware of the reports status.
“Not-airbrake” is shorthand for “canard flap shennanigans”, sorry if it was unclear. They’ve rejected the only report I can find under the premise that it is not physically possible for it to function that way.
