New Rafale MFD added
6 Likes
Wow that’s cracked!..
Meanwhile Typhoon players can we have a working Radar…
2 Likes
While I understand why it should be pushed…
Rafale will the single most broken plane in game…
Hopefully F15E and else don’t get 120C
We need decompression first
He indicated yesterday that ARH anti-ship guided missiles are not of interest at the moment in the game because they do not impact the gameplay much and that they are not concerned about them at the moment (even if the Japanese were allowed to have theirs). Personally, this frustrates me enormously
Until we get them, there aren’t going to be targets that warrant them. It should be added purely to enable more variant gameplay. Like actually giving us ships to target. I was miffed when it wasn’t added with etendard, I am quite a bit more frustrated that we get new ones for another nation but not exocet which is arguably the more famous option.
1 Like
Huh. I wonder what made them think the rafale/mica needed this… At all.
Can’t possibly imagine.
3 Likes
120C wont be any different from 120B apart from tracking times off the rail and it has a limited HOB capability.
MICA Was already the best missile on the best platform buffing close range performance essentially now France have IRIS-T on an aircraft.
1 Like
You do know that 120C is purely tracking upgrade and a slight increase in range.
Unless it’s a 120C7 which I would doubt
The C-variant has been steadily upgraded since it was introduced. The AIM-120C has smaller “clipped” aerosurfaces to enable increased internal carriage on the [USAF] F-22 Raptor from four to six AMRAAMs. The AIM-120C-5 and above have an improved HOBs (High Off Bore-Sight) capability which improves its G overload and seekers field of view over the previous variants allowing the missile to be more manoeuvrable and be used at targets that are offset from the launching aircraft frontal view which allows for greater flexibility during air-to-air combat.
LOL, I want the rafale so bad holy fuck thats amazing LMFAO
Aim 120 was improved by the120C-5 standard (the version we got) for greater range, and high off boresight capacity.
Please give your thoughts on this topic, and re-share as well.
@DirectSupport sorry for pinging you, is this the same capability as the one you’ve shown? Looks like it to me, but the last launches didn’t track (most likely cause of the R-77 not being TVC)
I don’t support the C-5 either. But even with it, how does this justify it? (It doesn’t)
You should put a vote thing if you can no ?
1 Like
…what? what does that comment mean? justify what?
most of your post in here are you, crying about the rafale, the mica and whatever else, take a break man.
1 Like
It’s accurate to the missile, it keeps it ahead of a missile coming in that has much longer effective range (even assuming the range of MICA is fixed) and provided they update the G overload figure to the figures I’ve seen being passed around by yanks, it is incredibly justified to fix the short range flaws. Arguably we should push for both short range fixes and fixes for MICA’s range issues.
Yes, thanks for the reminder, poll is up now
1 Like
Reading is hard :(
And why do you think that is? It’s not because the Rafale is performing as it should or underperforming.
You guys are high on cope if you think MICA and Rafale collectively will be threatened by anything in game.
A 120C will still be so easy to notch while you send buffed MICAs into anything that comes into 20km from you
1 Like