This is nonsense, it is impossible to achieve such results with rockets. And at what angle did it turn out to be less than 1m^2 with what frequency, what wavelength was it?
The Rafale D(A) has an elongated nose shape, wider airframe, differently placed and tilted canards and is less optimized for a reduced RCS. You will have to find a source referring to the Rafale C.
Besides this, Rafale A had less RAM applied / planned than actual production Rafale as far as I am aware as well.
Actually, even less than I remember…
(yes, this is declassified and unlimted)
10 Likes
Here is a Turkish source that mentions Rafale
1 Like
Turkish sources are not something that should be taken seriously, Turkey doesnt have anything remotely close to Rafale and they are incapable of producing 4-5th gen jets, not the to mention their knowledge about Stealth and Avionics are pretty much non exists compare to other nations.
1 Like
Is it me or is the radar still slow to acquire the first targets ? And some remain invisible
Tbh for now i don’t see any upgrade over the RDY radar from the 2000-5F (outside of the 31° scan range, which is super slow to acquire targets)
Apologies for the late reply
That model is flawed, the anhedral of the wings is greatly exaggerated
It also over accentuates the dihedral tilt of the canards
The intakes also take on a shape more similar to an eye rather than their actual shape which is designed to reflect waves in towards the inner nose and reflected away from the radar
It seems it is represented in a way that is the absolute least flattering towards its capabilities.
This separate model is has some large flaws as well but seems to more accurately represent the Rafale
so 1.5m^2 average all round, 1m^2 frontal average(if its to be believed which is unlikely)
I don’t know, but that is what the report suggests.
You can see that the Rafale incorporates many stealth features when you compare it to Eurofighter, which many of these papers do not properly assess.
Here’s some examples that you should take a look at when comparing the Rafale with Eurofighter, F-22, or Su-57 for instance:
Serration on Rafale’s canards compared to none on Eurofighter’s:
Shaped serpentine serrated intake for Rafale versus boxy non-serrated intake for EF2K
The Rafale removed dedicated airbrake in favor of using control surfaces instead as an airbrake, similar to F-22, Su-57, further lowering the RCS compared to Eurofighter which has kept the standard airbrake control surface:
Here’s F-22 and Su-57 airbraking with control surfaces instead of having dedicated control surfaces:
Spoiler
Serrated panels on underside of Rafale versus none on Eurofighter:
Note how the Su-57 can rotate its IRST to hide it, Rafale can do the same. However the Eurofighter’s IRST is very much fixed and visible:
Further, the engines of the Rafale went through electromagnetic signature reductions:
The radar is also fixed arrays which helps to considerably reduce radar returns:
Spoiler
21 Likes
Many of the stealth features seen on the F-22 and Su-57 are readily seen on the Rafale, there’s no avoiding acknowledging that.
If you wish to see more close-up photos of these features, and perhaps discussions about it, feel free to visit these sites:
Serrated panels all across the Rafale [Album] : r/WarplanePorn
12 Likes
I don’t think a popular book can be a trustworthy source.
Spoiler
1 Like
The Indian MOD urgently needed to justify the purchase of such expensive machines.
It’s a pity that the Indians didn’t take a picture of the Rafale from the front, not the side. I think they consulted with Dassault’s marketing department.
At this angle, the Su-30 also doesn’t shine forward very brightly. Sorry, there is no better quality picture. Although there is no doubt that straight ahead Rafale certainly emits less.
1 Like
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
To my understanding, these weren’t released by the Indian MoD, but instead someone took pictures with a thermal camera and decided to release them.
No, it’s official video from some parade.
Man for real it’s you that is giving us the urge to facepalm. First you use 2 sources that state the same thing and that are wrong to begin with. All you’ve been claiming is that Rafale can’t have an RCS of 0.01m² because some chart that is not accurate at all stated so but i’ll let you know that real studies made by radar research institutes classifiy Low observability aircrafts as low observability only when these aircrafts go under 1m² of RCS Rafale being a low observability aircraft is under 1m² of RCS, may you like it or not. Now for Very Low Observability(VLO) aircrafts such as B2, F22 and F35 for example their RCS must be below 0.01m² of RCS and can go as small as 0.0001m² of RCS. You are believeing in somehting that is hereby false we can’t do anything more for you.
11 Likes
Got a link to it?
1 Like
So like every “stealth” fighter ever adopted, because they dont have any RCS reducing features and just use coatings as a crutch. RIP YF-23