typhoon and rafale are so much fuel efficient. the way they manage their autonomy is a lot similar to the gripen atm so the ideal setting (at least for me) it’s 20 + tank in RB, 30min in SIM without tank
the HMD is not live (because gajin forgot to put it on the plane) but its IR lock symbology
From 2021, they are outselling even F-35.
Rafale exports from 2021 are nearly double of F-35. Its beating everything thats not F35 outside of NATO. And only reason why its not higher, is dassault not being able to build them fast enough. They literally cant keep up with demand. European countries being d*mb and relying on unreliable US is another thing.
After todays update I can see what happened; the Rafale had the A-10Cs JHMCS as placeholder, now receiving its own.
does it still have iff on the hmd?
it actually didnt, it new one forked from a-10c but not put on rafale
on dev it actually has it now, its just circle and double circle
Wait shouldn’t A-10 have scorpion HMD though? So it should’ve been fine if they used the same one with different symbology but they used the wrong helmet?
It has Scorpion as far as I can tell, its just called a10c_hmd or smth like that in the files.
It only seems to add one-two circles to locked largets, as seen on pictures posted.
Also going to report the missing coloring of the OFS.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/AVQEwE4rYc6U
4 Likes
my bad, just got a bit confused when you said JHMCS (its a different HMD)
Dassault pulled this off on one Airshow only and never again, since.
There’s a reason for that. Ask Dassault how was Rafale supercruising in Leh, during Indian trials. :D
You can publicly lie for only so long…
Anything about target in stt, TWS track… DLZ symbology?? I dont believe that fighter HMD lacks such important information.
Think you can do one for missing guncover?
Ofc, it is. French tried to pull this only once because it was on home turf, but ppl started laughing and things got quite inconvenient. :D
didn’t know you were serious.
you know that this isnt quite the case right? if i advertise that my product can do a certain thing, and then the customer finds out that it is a marketing lie, then you’re finished as a defence contractor.
Not this guy
That’s your opinion, but it doesn’t quite work like that.
GJ is gonna do what GJ does, anyway, so…sometimes it’s just funny to watch. :D
it’s not my opinion and it’s not about gaijin, you pulled out the thing that dassault lied about raf supercruise performance (without any proof to back it up).
if this is the case then gaijin is right to label the M1.5 supercruise of the Typhoon as “clear marketing lie” because they think it’s impossible
2 Likes
you know him?
It’s like with RBE2-AA. It was advertised with 1000+ T/R modules and 40 simultaneously tracked targets. In the end, when it came out, it had 838 modules and the information about simultaneously tracked targets did not appear anywhere else. Isn’t that a ‘clear marketing lie’?
1 Like
Could customers “preorder” that 1000 modules aesa or could they buy only finished 833 modules product? If they couldnt order 1000 module one, its not marketing lie as you cant even get fictional product.