F4 will probably come when others get 120C-5, iris-t and asraam…
And if it comes with mica NG… we will most likely get real mica range but on NG (80km instead of ±100)
First and foremost MICA NG won’t work as they should in real life as they’ll probably just get a longer booster and sustainer than 2 distinct motor impulses. ALSO with only 6 MICA on Rafale you can actually use low missile count as an excuse to push MICA fixes even if gaijin will likely turn a blind eye on it like they always do. It is a pain that once a report is accepted it can just fall into the abyss of ignorance from gaijin. Even worse is the fact if you remake a report it’ll get classified as duplicate, rightfully, but still annoying. There is nothing that can be done to attract dev attention to specific bug reports after some time adn that’s an issue imo.
1 Like
but they wont fix it… jesus… if they wanted, it would have been fixed long time ago…
Everything that could have been reported was reported and IGNORED for months.
They dong give a single F about french TT and Mica. It wont receive buffs because *** US mains will keep flying into arm lenght ranges and keep eating off bore micas, instead of playing BVR where mica cant compete even with god damn R77.
10 Likes
What can i say except “Adapt to the situation” like… Even if we received 8 missiles would that truly change anything? You’d still have to skim above ground and then launch your MICAs at less than 10kms the only change is the kill potential you have. And technically due to MICA having to be fired at close range a Rafale has more kill potential than anything in game as most players will lose a lot of missiles early in match by yeeting them long range and will arrive at close distance with 4 or less missiles.
Well yeah, exactly… when i survive the initial onslaught, i want to punish anyone that closes down with enough bang.
If i manage to get in the middle of enemy team, i want to punish as many of them as possible. 6 missiles simply aint enough at top tier. With how stupid easy it is to chaff them, you end up with 50% hit rate on average at best. Usually lower. I dont even want magic IIs… i want more ARHs. F-15Es are running around with 8 best ARHs in the game on best high alt BVR platform. I dont see a single reason why france cant have 8 worst bvr fox3s in the game on one jet. Only because french air force never bought the capability or never mounted them? Well… russia never mounted double racks on Su-27SM, they never mounted KH-38MT on SU-25, they never armed Yak-141.
I dont care about accuracy when one nation gets absurdity like 38MT on plane that NEVER USED IT AT ALL.
7 Likes
It pains me as much as anyone that a plane i looked realy forward to is very mid A2A-wise, I could literally CRY over it okay, but i just try to be happy with what i get because we won’t get better.
And anyway i suppose we’ll see Rafale F4.1 or F4.2 before the third update of 2025 so for now i’ll just wait and see how it goes.
2 Likes
Sometimes i wondered if those people were not just uk/ger/ita player trying to screw our plane undercover
2 Likes
but but but we must have 100% historical accuracy !!! [!]
2 Likes
Less drag also?
i dont think so.its “airbrakeCD”
SMH France getting the Indian Rafale before me
Get out,… Indian Rafale have no sense to be added into UK TT ^^"
Better it become a Squadron vehicule within France.
3 Likes
More drag but more lift too.
That’s Oswald efficiency number
The CDK Rafale has an SP3 Pylons, but the in-game Rafale does not yet.
7 Likes
Why somebody might angry gaijin add Indian vehicles for british ?
Might be domestic french Rafale B F2.2 or Rafale M LF.1, my guess
Because tree system won’t make sens anymore, tbey could literally get every plane: Eurofighter, Gripen, Rafale, Su30, Mig29
2 Likes
India is a sub tree of Britain and has been said many times by Smin
There will be no Indian Rafale in the French tree
If it came it would go to the UK
Interesting
This is so false, afaik he only said that Indian vehicles would be used to fill gaps if needed.