Would be nice to have exocet and scalp but we won’t be getting those for a while I’d wager. At least now I know what to hope for in the event they bother to implement these things.
This is handy.
For clarity, GBU 24 is completely adequate as ordnance, I just personally am not thrilled by it and have not been with it on any of the aircraft I like that can carry it.
Gaijin seem really odd about adding anti-ship missiles. They added them as a gimmick on the German Tornado then refused to add them to anything else until randomly the F-2A got them.
They did add proper sea skimming to the AS.34 on the dev server though so maybe they’re preparing to add more anti-ship missiles.
I have considered pinging smin about that to try and interrogate them to find out if that is the case, because I very much want exocet. I seek to smite the boats.
But also, no idea if it is remotely worth it.
I did. at least a bit
So basically, if its not a benefit to GRB. its a low priority
That is the single least useful answer he could have devised I feel. Bleh.
😿
Guess we won’t be getting exocet any time soon.
Quite bold for a guy that only main F-14 😏
Yeah further research led me to that conclusion. Still I’ve never seen the Rafale carry two separate things on its two belly hardpoints so I wonder what they’re for
Maybe just in case they ever need them for a future ordnance or smth
It’s more about not being a empty-brained nationalist. I just happen to like the F-14.
Well at least most of these people are indeed playing Rafale (or EFT to some extent) unlike yours. And good luck assuming all the Bug Reporter are French Nationalist, definitely unbiased opinion.
saying that the bug reporting managers hate france is definitly not unbaised either
Sea Eagles on Buccaneer would be dope
Saying the truth that the person who stonewalled the bug report is incompetent or illiterate is however, not biased towards france. Or the UK, for that matter.
Well I don’t say that fortunately, and for the records the guy that keeps coping about Rafale claims himself to have played it AND YET don’t have it on his account and instead only maining F-14, which is quite hypocritical for the sake of accountability of argument.
Even if I hadn’t played the Rafale, you don’t need to be a doctor to see someone is having trouble breathing. You don’t need to play the Rafale to see it’s actively breaking the game.
yeah… sure.
Guys this Topic is about the Rafale so debate and talk about the Rafale not the user,
you can disagree with them and can provide why you think your right etc but at no point should it be users attacking each other.
There’s already thread for debating Rafale Vs Eurofighter that including Rafale being overperforming. But for some reason the debate went quiet and the debate is coming back to this thread and getting derailed again by the cope army.
Yes, I wouldn’t continue this rant, I’d just leave the thread here so the debate regarding Rafale being overpowered can be done there and not here.
then maybe lock the troublesome people off the topic, yes? They are derailing and mass flagging with abusive off topics all the time, why should the burden of respecting topics fall upon respectful users??
You can’t lock people out of Topic’s for one and if someone is mass false flagging it get’s dealt with and in regards to your last part of your comment I understand your point of view but as I said Highlight the user’s causing issues and we will deal with it if they broken any rules.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
