Side profile a Magic 2 from that range is pretty dangerous although I must say I have only used them on the 2000 C4 and not against the 14.0s
might be that then
i think a f-15e, EF or Rafale can just outrun those missiles if they want in side aspect
Usually the magic 2 has the range to hit targets at up to 2-2.5km against low supersonic jets with an aircraft launch at the same speed at ground level.
It will be slightly lower for faster target/slower launch vehicle, and higher at higher altitude .
At 2.5km if the enemy doesn’t perform maneuver you’ll reach it just fine but if he starts maneuvering the magic 2 can lose too much speed
1 Like
Swedish Gripen from the 211th Fighter Division and French Rafale somewhere at the height of the Arctic Circle.
More from the same exercise :
12 Likes
Rafales and Gripens in formation is perfection itself
1 Like
The 2 best looking eurocanards by a huge margin imo
8 Likes
The 3 eurocanards design make me think of this :
Spoiler
2 being nice and the other one is just here for the sake of it.
EF be like :
Spoiler
3 Likes
Ngl im more a eurofighter fan but rafale is a close 2nd for me
The Rafale would be a good looking plane but the fuel boom destroys it for me
I think you mixed it with this :
Spoiler
1 Like
and the eurofighter be like
11 Likes
2 Likes
i just noticed the air intakes get more to the side the more you go towards them first EF2000 having them below then rafaelle having them a bit to the side and then gripen having them all the way on the side
It’s like a saggy depressed Bowler Hat Guy
Put some respect on my boy Goob.
Fair, fair
1 Like
But the point was and still is that AIM-9M is a joke in that regard compared to R-27.