Fair enough, I’ve been hearing so many EFT vs Rafale comparisons it’s an auto-response from me.
Can it hit mach 2.8 or does it just have the thrust to be able to hit that (how do you even come up with the 2nd one btw?)
In-game it cannot hit Mach 2.8 as the airframe would disintegrate, but yes it has enough thrust to do that. But Gaijin could make it have a thrust-drop off after Mach 2.3 for the engine’s thrust which wouldn’t affect the post-Mach acceleration anyway. And wdym by coming up with the 2nd one?
Oh ok.
What I mean is, how do you find out it does 2.8 specifically? Do you just run the numbers assuming the airframe doesn’t break?
Statshark graph, though you could also make a user mission with increased VNe if you wanted a more accurate number (statshark isnt perfectly accurate, but its good at giving you an idea)
Which reminds me, did anyone even verify statshark’s claim of Rafale doing Mach 2.8 with increased VNE?
@dark_claw may have tested it out to that speed, they were the first to bring up how massive the buff was.
Who knows. The community has been very touchy recently and many post get hidden for seemingly no reason (not saying many post shouldn’t have been hidden tho)
Mainly for the types of comments you’re making, I’d advise not typing anything offensive or rage baity if you don’t want it to be hidden.
@sudo_su1 Don’t abuse the flag system. Thanks.
LOL, now people think I’ve been flagging the posts here
For the sake of clarification, he’s referring to me posting a clip of sarcastically flagging vizender’s post …
Which is abusing it as it had no reason to be flagged. Not really sure your point, but anyways don’t discuss removed comments and keep it on topic o/
Is there a reason why NCTR isn’t shown in the cockpit for sim?
Croatia (by their minister of defence) might look to upgrade and modernize rafale’s armament.
(I heard a lot those f3r were still pesa for some reason so maybe that ? those rafale could be modernized up to the f4.1 standard, and, as far as i understand, putting mica ng on them is possible after it has been tested etc…)
The students were offended that their plane was being humiliated
I would say the light theme for starters
I guess these could be slightly less provocative
As I wrote above, students who do not know hydro-gas dynamics complained that their beloved plane was being humiliated
I did not deal with that flag, can only briefly see comments about it. But like i said don’t discuss removed comments here, If you want clarification you can DM me and i’ll tag the mod who dealt with it.