Dassault-Breguet Mirage IIIR2Z - "South Africa's Shooting Star"

Would you like to see the Mirage IIIR2Z in game?
  • Yes, I would.
  • No, I would not.
0 voters


History

South Africa’s air force has a long history with the Mirage III and F1 families, enthusiastically using them from the 60’s until the turn of the century (if you count the Cheetahs.) Naturally, this included many variants like trainers, attackers, and interceptors, but one small group stands out above the rest as possibly the fastest Mirage III not only in the SAAF inventory but in the entire world - the Mirage IIIR2Z.



The Mirage IIIR was a dedicated reconnaissance variant of the Mirage III. Developed from the Mirage IIIE, it had much of its avionics removed and was overall lighter, but still heavier than the Mirage IIIC due to its navigational computer, extra fuel and strengthened airframe. The Cyrano radar in the nose was replaced with a camera package, but the outer missile pylons and DEFA cannons were still available for self-defense. It would soon be developed into the Mirage IIIRD, featuring a heavy doppler navigational radar behind the camera pack whose weight put the plane back on par with the Mirage IIIE.


Close-up of the original RZ variant, based on the RD, whose heavy radar created a bulge behind the camera pack.


A batch of four Mirage IIIRZs, an export version of the Mirage IIIRD was ordered and delivered in the early 70’s, with four Mirage IIIR2Zs following in the mid 70’s. The RZ and R2Z (the Z representing South Africa) both had non-standard camera packages compared to the base model, using Vinten cameras rather than the original French package. The R2Z removed the navigational radar that the RD and RZ were equipped with, making it overall much more similar to the original R variant in terms of weight. Mirage IIIR2Zs would be used extensively in the Bush War for reconnaissance, with one being lost to a SAM battery. They would be retired with the rest of the Mirage IIIs when the Bush War and Cold War both drew to a close.


Mirage IIIR2Z in early camouflage pattern.


There were three major distinguishing features between the Mirage IIIR2Z and its original French ancestor. During the closing years of the Bush War, as part of upgrades being applied to South Africa’s Mirage fleet before postwar budget cuts and the Cheetah program sidelined them, the remaining R2Zs were given a locally developed RWR system using semispherical antennae with digital target identification and range estimation. Secondly, the R2Z was capable, like other South African Mirages, of using the V3B Kukri infrared missile on its outer pylons. The V3B was notable for being designed to work with an HMCS, allowing for sight-based targeting within the seeker’s gimbal limits; however, it doesn’t appear that this system made it to the Mirage III fleet. While the Mirage IIIR2Z very rarely carried missiles, it was entirely possible.


“Scalloped” intake for the new, hungrier engine.


The reason it didn’t carry missiles most of the time was because of its third major change - the engine. The Mirage IIIR2Z used the Snecma Atar 9K-50, as found on the Mirage F1, but in a much lighter airframe. To put things into perspective, if we were to go off the in-game values for the 9K-50 engine and not the stated 5,000/7,200 kgf static thrust, the Mirage IIIIR2Z would still have nearly as much static TWR at full fuel as the Mirage F1C has optimal TWR at full fuel. With modified air intakes to feed the more powerful engine, it was a contender for the fastest Mirage III to ever fly. Because of this, air-to-air missiles for self-defense were viewed as unnecessary for operational use, since the Mirage IIIR2Z would simply outrun its assailant. The level of confidence South Africa had in this strategy was a testament to this shooting star’s true performance.


Why it should be in War Thunder

The Mirage IIIR2Z has more limited armaments than fighter versions of the Mirage III. However, it’s a veritable hot rod with potent South African missiles adding variety compared to the Mirage’s normal armament, and unlike most recon vehicles, it’s perfectly capable of fighter combat. In fact, someone was even crazy enough to put combined fuel/rocket pods on it at one point! However, you would have to contend with the Atar 9K-50’s fuel consumption with the Mirage III’s fuel load, making conservative afterburning or drop tanks a must. This vehicle would be very welcome around the 10.3-10.7 range, where it could exploit its performance to streak through the skies searching for prey.


Specifications


Dassault-Breguet Mirage IIIR2Z


Dimensions

  • Span: 8.22 m
  • Length: 15.50 m
  • Height: 4.5 m
  • Wing area: 34.85 m2

Weight:

  • ~6,500 kg empty (estimated)
  • ~8,400 kg full fuel (estimated)
  • 13,700 kg MTOW

Propulsion: Snecma Atar 9K-50 turbojet (5,000 kgf static thrust; 7,200 kgf static thrust (wet))

Thrust/Weight Ratio (full fuel, static thrust): 0.60 dry (0.86 wet)

Maximum speed: > Mach 2

Armament:

  • Guns:
    • 2 x DEFA 552A 30mm cannon (125 rounds per gun, 250 total)
  • Missiles:
    • 2 x AIM-9B Sidewinder or
    • 2 x V3B Kukri
  • Rockets:
    • 2 x Matra JL-100 combined fuel tank/rocket pods (19 SNEB rockets each, 38 total)
  • Drop tanks:
    • 2 x RP30 1,700 liter drop tank
    • 3 x RP62 1,300 liter drop tank
    • 2 x RP18R 500 liter fixed fuel tank
    • 2 x 110G 500 liter drop tank
    • 1 x RP825 1,100 liter drop tank

Crew: 1

Additional Equipment:

  • CRWS radar warning receiver
  • RIMS countermeasure dispenser
    • 84 x chaff or
    • 40 x flare


Sources:

10 Likes

+1 for the British tree, the Chilean Mirage Pantera had the same engine as this one but this one having a lighter fuselage was somewhat faster, interesting information.

1 Like

My thirst for ever more Mirage III/5/50 variants is insatiable.

+1

To my mind, Mirage IIIR2Z would be event vehicle in rank VII if Mirage IIICZ & Mirage IIIEZ as a researchable

1 Like

+1. Do you have any more info on the HMCS that was used and any other South African planes that had it insalled?

Kukri-2-768

mirage_f1_cz_saaf-213_10_dvdb07

When the system was first introduced, the helmet had an attachment on each side which the reference unit uses to calculate the head angle (seen mounted to the left of the gunsight in this Mirage F1CZ.) At the time I made this post I was under the impression that the HMCS was part and parcel for any aircraft equipped with the V3 series of missile. But without this unit, which is not present in any pictures I’ve seen of the SAAF’s Mirage IIIs, it wouldn’t be possible for this first generation system to function. Then again, the Cheetah doesn’t have such a system and it still has HMCS.

LL1NtzP

The best indicator that the Mirage IIIR2Z might have had HMCS functionality is that the “roll stab” button was moved from the control stick to the left hand side of the cockpit. On the Mirage F1CZ the lower left button on the control stick would be used for the V3. On the standard Mirage III this was a “roll stab” button, however in SAAF Mirages (excluding the IIIC and maybe IIIB/D, haven’t checked those) the roll stab is moved to the left. All this is to say I basically have no idea what aircraft this was installed in and which it wasn’t. I can definitively say it was installed in the Mirage F1CZ and not installed in the Impala Mk.II.

7 Likes

+1 Very nice

1 Like

Thank you for all the work you put in here Headnaught :) Would love to see this in Brits Air tree.

Does the HMCS only work for aiming the missile or does it also display most HUD information?

I believe it’s only for the missile.

1 Like

+1 would be interesting

1 Like

The main source I relied on for this post was amended since I originally made it, and it confirms the RZ and R2Z used countermeasures. 84 of them, to be exact, since there are 4 packs mounted and each pack carries 21 chaff cartridges or 10 flares (flares take up the space of 2 chaff and you can’t exactly put half a flare in there.) These dispensers would later be adapted for use in the Cheetah C’s integrated countermeasure dispenser.

image

image

I had seen the above drawing before, but assumed it was a one-off for export and never gained any traction. After all this was offered to the export market around the same time as the Kukri, and neither saw any success there. However the author of the Mirage III in SAAF Service e-publication, Malcom Reid, got information from an ex 2 Squadron SAAF armorer who confirmed this installation was supplied to recce Mirages late in the Bush War. This allowed Mr. Reid to examine photos he had previously compiled and identify instances of the RZ and R2Z using the RIMS mountings on the missile pylons.

Screenshot 2026-08-29 185013

The RZs would carry missiles on these pylons, while the R2Zs would omit the missiles in operational use to minimize drag at high supersonic speeds. This explains why there are late war photographs of the R2Zs carrying missile pylons without the actual launch rail that goes with it; they were using it for the countermeasures mountings rather than armorers just being lazy.

Admittedly the above photos are not the most convincing, but at a bare minimum the R2Z is definitively wired for countermeasures. This can be seen in the cockpit where a flare controller with a red cap was added in the lower left of the instrument panel. So in terms of being fitted for but not with, it clears that bar even if you don’t trust the veracity of Reid’s claims about operational use. These are also not illumination flares, the cockpit already has a control for those built into the Mirage III’s armament selector. I don’t remember why I was looking at the cockpit pictures today, but I do remember seeing the flare control, which was the impetus for me double-checking the SAAF site.

As for less good news, in all the material I’ve seen there’s no proof of HMCS ever being used with the Mirage IIIs. The V3B is still a solid missile, just worth keeping in mind.

4 Likes

+1, always fancy for SA Mirages

1 Like