LOL. I mean, why didn’t they get panzers like Finland did or get something from Britain or France/make their own tank? Why wait till the 50’s?
Ground wasn’t a focus, money problems were huge, we were basically taken by Germany and left with nothing. When we were free after the war we had scraps of German vehicles which we repurposed to remove mines and other German military defenses. Air and Sea were a more important focus after the war and Germany didn’t seem to be as big of a worry as air and naval vehicles seemed to be more of a requirement as via ground invasion Germany would be the only group to worry about.
Essentially having to pull our economy and what remains we had out of the mud and it took a while.
I’m kind of tired of Shermans and the Copy Paste. It’s not my favorite, and I don’t really see why it should be added as Sweden already has a good number of tanks at that BR range.
Sorry.
1 Like
What good tanks do they have? Cause im gonna be real thats a hard take to accept at face value given ive played nearly every nations 5.x lineups and sweden is easily one of the worst especially in uptiers.
T34-85 and M/42 DT are the only usable tanks, 74 and PVK are both too slow and poorly armored while having cannons comparable to mediums and heavies at their BR making them having no advantages over their opponents.
So you’re a dane wow.
I know. God Please Fix naval and stop addnig Ctrl C+V tanks for wallet warriors and actually make the game playable.
1 Like
Id hope i was, otherwise im very lost lmao
Naval is unloved by the snail lets be real, id kill for a naval update focus (im going off topic though)
The Comet, the T-34-85, the Strv m/42 DT, the Strv 74. Those are decent at the very least. You also have access to the PT, PVKV, USH 204, and LVKV. All in the 5.x range.
This vehicle isn’t exceptional, and especially not exceptionally better than anything mentioned above. Their is no reason for it, and no need for it. I am very against Copy and Paste especially in this setting because of how much it isn’t needed.
1 Like
Enough with the copy paste. There are enough Shermans
1 Like
nope, it would be 5.0 or even 5.3. The one already present is a 75mm sherman (at 3.7 i believe)
It may just be my style but sniping is incredible tedious. I cant bring myself to play the PT, PVKV, or the 74. The DT and T34 are the only vehicles id bother bringing since i need the mobility lest i get a 1000lb from any US plane. As for AA the ush is silly but too slow and bouncy to be used for AA and with no armor nor crew its pretty much just food for anyone with a machine gun of any caliber. Its just makes a frustrating lineup with 2 decent vehicles. Id kill for literally any other nations 5.x lineup since i need mobility to get from different points. Its honestly surprising that the DT isnt 5.7 and the 74 5.0 given how meh the squished tank is.
But that is the role some of these vehicles are good at. The M4A3E4 is not going to be better than any of the vehicles in the Swedish TT at anything. The T-34 has a similar gun and better armor; the Comet has a better gun and worse armor; the DT has a better reload, but similar pen with light armor; etc. etc. Their is no reason to add the Sherman. It adds nothing.
I’m sorry you don’t like the style, but that doesn’t mean that the vehicles are bad or that the Sherman is necessary. If you want the Sherman, and the Sherman playstyle, the solution is simple; play the US. Do not ask for it in another TT when it is wholly not necessary
You kinda ignored the most basic buff this thing has over something like the 74, mobility and armor dont get me wrong the M4’s dont have the best mobility but its definitely better than the 74 and they dont have to worry about 50 call nuking their crew on one strafe. Essentially this would be a better strv 74 and more than likely at 5 0 whoch means its on a better lineup. Thats a fairly big difference given playing 5.7 Essentially forces you to play planes that are 2 BR’s worse than what they fight on average as 5.7 plays 6.7 a lot.
To me is very much seems you just haven’t played the vehicles i apologize if you have but given you continue to ignore the performance of some of them u dont feel you have a good enough opinion to rate them considering you seem to just be judging of stat card rather than from your own experience.
1 Like
It’s a sniper. Play it like a Sniper. You don’t like having to Snipe? Play the US for the playstyle you want. Simple As. Again; no need for it in the TT.
not necessary? maybe.
Adding a Sherman to another TT? My good sir, there is already a Sherman in literally every TT, be it premium or TT. instead it’s one more Sherman that may actually bring something useful to a TT.
I have up to 8.7 Sweden, I barely bothered to touch 5.0/5.7 Sweden. the best tank at 5.0/5.7 for me was the 5.0 TD, and I barely even played that.
1 Like
I have most of the US, when i play 5.7 i have the linup i want. This is more so about every nation having a competitive lineup. The Strv 74 is not a 5.7 comparable vehicle as most 5.3’s do its job better in every regard. Your entire argument is reading reading stats and saying what you think about a vehicle it seems you haven’t played. This conversation isnt really going anywhere so we should agree to disagree.
1 Like
Fine, but regardless. No Swedish Sherman. It is wholly unnecessary.
Thats is left entirely up to the snail we as players have no say, we could both agree its a good addition or a bad one and its the snails final say.
Taiwan M1A1T is something that will be interesting to see given its the only nation with a confirmed subtree.
I am against it in favor of domestic Chinese vehicles but snail has final say for these decisions.
Yea. USSR has a premium M4A2, while Japan has a premium M4A3 (76) W. Germany has a captured sherman, the M4 748 (a). Israel has the M-51 and the M-51 (W), and China has the normal M4A4 and the M4A4 (1st PTG) and a M4A1 75 (W). Italy has a M4 hybrid, M4A4, M4 Tipo 1C, and the Sherman Vc. UK has the Sherman II, Sherman firefly, Skink, and Poland (in the UK TT) has the Sherman IC “Trzyniec”. France has the M4A1, M4A3 (105), M4A4, M4A1 (FL10), M4A4 (SA50) and the M4A3E2. And the US has the M4, M4A1, M4A2, M4A3 (105), M4A1 (76) W, M4A2 (76) W, the Calliope, Cobra King, M4A3 (76) W, M4A3E2 (76) W, and the M4A3E2. That is a total of 31 Shermans in the entire TT, and almost all of the major TT’s have this tank, and so the Sherman is the most numerous tank in the whole game. And do we need to make it 32 now?