This has no relation to the F-111C and the US has no need of a Leopard.
An F-111 is something many British players have requested. Sadly with the K not being possible, the Australian domestic C is the next best fit. America too receives its own variants.
Planned doesn’t do anything for the game. Gaijin planned to fix T33 slope modifiers 5 years ago.
As I said, they are not just planned, but in progress.
You’re being pedantic and cherrypicking examples. Arguing with a CM won’t do anything for you.
How many examples do you need before it’s no longer cherry picking?
Any updates on fixing AP sloped performance?
And before I’m told that’s unrelated to this thread, none of the threads on these subjects actually get a response.
How many examples of Australian vehicles in the British tech tree do you need before you accept it’s a commonwealth vehicle?
You really want a Leopard 2K without the 20mm gun?
The 120S is superior in every way but raw acceleration.
Oh not even, cause it’s 105mm if I remember correctly.
The Leopard 2AV USA trialed is just an XM-1 without thermals.
We got the:
Wirraway
Boomerang Mk.I
Boomerang Mk.II
Beaufort Mk.VIII
Beaufighter Mk.21
Thunderbolt Mk.1 (got a British skin rn but used to be Australian)
Matilda Hedgehog
Sentinel Mk.I
Sentinel Mk.IV
Centurion Mk.5/1
HMAS Tobruk
HMAS Arrow
Didn’t the dedicated air-to-air model F-15s whoop the Typhoons in every single wargame they’ve ever played together? I mean, the Eagle IS undefeated in air-to-air combat…
F-15E Strike Eagle’s a pure ground-pounder.
Yeah, why wouldn’t we want it? The 2AV got the DM33 while Gaijin refuses to give the M1 or XM1 M833.
Not that I am aware off. Typhoon is better in someways the F-15 is better in others. But in BVR they are fairly easily matched (except for the quantity of missiles the F-15 can carry) and in WVR the Typhoon is superior. (Typhoon has beaten the F-22 in WVR combat)
Also so is the Sea Harrier FRS1, none lost in A2A combat and unlike the F-15, fought massively outnumbered.
But when the Sea harrier FRS1 took on the F-15A in 2v2 combat in the early 1980s. The Sea Harrier won at a ratio 3:1. Absolutely destroyed the F-15. (they also beat the US F-5E Aggressor squadron at a ratio of 8:1 in 1v1 combat) Check out “Sea Harrier Over the Falklands” for the details of those fights
How many foreign built commonwealth vehicles not going to the UK tree will it take before you accept that isn’t how it works?
I honestly Feel like the j-10 and a couple of the foldered vehicles of the J-11 line should be put after the H-5, we are going to need more than 1 PRC fighter line
2AV wouldn’t get DM33.
And even IF it did, it wouldn’t fit in the 10.0 lineup.
Yeah, the Americans have this nasty tendency to let other countries win sometimes (or rather, putting American pilots in unwinnable situations to see how they deal with it, to see whether they can turn it around) through the various wargames they’ve done over the years.
Those victories over the F-15 and F-22 can be counted as fake.
Hahaha. Yeah no they werent.
The combat vs the F-5E and F-15A in the Sea Harrier were 100% real and in fact the Sea Harrier was the one handicapped. The F-15s were the ones who challenged the Brits to the battle after they heard about the F-5Es ass kicking (that aggressor squadrons entire purpose was/is to put fellow nato countries through their paces and get real combat experience)
Just because “merica” doesnt mean that losses were fake. Other nations build good stuff as well and we have excellent pilots
Actual Competitors to the S1 Finally?
And by in progress do you mean active development? or just Passed to Devs and Approved.
Not sure where you’re getting that idea. The 2AV has DM33 and is 10.0.
…
Someone didn’t read what Gaijin has said MANY times in the past
I dare you prove unique commonwealth vehicles go anywhere else