CVR(T) Series - Technical Data and Discussion

You can remove the slat armour thank the gods

5 Likes

fat git is slightly less fat now woopieeee

1 Like

That’s reasonable, since there are Scimitars Mk2 without that armor. I’ll wear it anyway because I like it better aesthetically.

there isnt any HEAT shots it will currently defeat (even tho it should give 300mm protection from shape charges) so it genuinely isnt worthwhile other than for drip

I admit I’m a bit particular. For example, I only buy premium vehicles that I like aesthetically, regardless of whether they’re good or bad, and I do the same with Tech Tree tanks. Since I don’t particularly like chain link armor, I simply don’t use it, even though it’s the only armor that actually works in the game. I also don’t use the Conqueror’s armor, and I’d love to be able to remove the added armor from the American M60A3TTS or the Italian Leopard 2A2, since they didn’t have it while in service with their armies.
Regarding the fence armor, I seem to recall that besides causing the HEAT round to detonate sooner, it also caused the tail of the HEAT round to hit the fence if it passed through, deflecting it and causing it to strike the armor at a very extreme angle,something that doesn’t happen in the game.

2 Likes

I only own the vehicles i care about too. they are the only reason i play the game

2 Likes

Speaking of composite issues…


Just so happens to be right where the crew are too, ha. I guess needs a bug report?

4 Likes

Gaijin is a true expert at adding hugely flawed vehicles, while at the same time fixing a few errors, and forcing players to endure serious errors for years, or forever.

2 Likes

what gaijin thinks the Scimitar mk2 will be if its 8.0

10 Likes

Those turret plates will be HHA rather than composite anyway, they use small washers and there are turret fittings bolted directly to them.

Edit; or maybe aluminium alloy?

https://www.baesystems.com/en/article/delivering-tougher-recce-vehicles-for-afghan-ops

Is it possible that the CRV(T) family has fragmentation protection? In these images, it looked like a kind of layer covering the walls.
img_12-6.jpg.04bfb1366e9b77a6e3892bd9414ae9ed
img_4
img_9
image.jpeg.f0466b83d6927d6ed8f05f18d47aed54

4 Likes

IIRC it got suggested before to gaijin, however I think they turned around and claimed it was heat/sound proofing, lol. Or “not enough info”.

Huh nvm, at least 2 reports got accepted in the end

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/1kHATNsDA7MP

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/f1vxA3zQ9qtW

Of course, gaijin never actually implemented them.

I would argue that your pictures showing similar/the same spalling and those reports should be proof, but knowing the snail…

5 Likes

Ah, but they’re only two years old, we have to wait another two years for them to fix it. We’re just so impatient, we need to be patient haha.

5 Likes

Maybe if we are quick enough getting a report through, gaijin might give the scimi 2 its spall on launch… I know I know… a dream…

2 Likes

Also looks like the Scimitar 2s ammo boxes are not armoured currently?

And I think the fuel tanks are supposed to have limited armour also?

1 Like

Well, asked, and got an answer about if we need more data on the scimi 2 spall lining.

So I guess anyone with any good pics/data use the previous reports to help back yourself up and punt it in to hopefully get spall lining before it goes live and is forgotten for 5 years?

( my initial comment Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion - #4570 by Mitchverr )

2 Likes

Noticing that Striker’s UFP is AA7017 25mm, while Scimitar mk2 is 7039 20mm, which one is correct?

neither of them are most probably correct, from what ive been able to roughly measure on CVRTs ive gotten close to at museums but i havents been able to get close enough to a striker or spartan hull with a tape measure to give any hard figures

2 Likes

I heard that some Strikers are owned by private collectors. If I could get accurate information from them, that would be great, but unfortunately, I don’t have any of their contact information

3 Likes

CVRTs are quite common in private ownership. they were quite cheap until the ukraine war where a lot of them were sent over there (despite being pretty useless for the most part due to their demilitarisation) so its common to see them at military shows by private collectors or at random little museums across the island

1 Like