CV90Mk4.. why?

1000 krone price tag on that bad boy. Guess ill forclose my house

1 Like

I’m already hurting too bad with the Pumas 😭

I might die if they added it with all the stuff Sweden is lacking. Would be the most quintessential snail move.

2 Likes

If you haven’t seen people play the 9030 i really recommend it. You have no advantages and struggle to kill a T55 lmao. Then he just insta kills you as you cry

2 Likes

I can simulate that pain when using the Marders with their “DM63” (Rubber Bullets)
I’ve got a buddy that spaded rank 1-7 in Sweden, ill have him show me tonight haha.

I can confirm the cv9030 is one of the worst vehicles in the Swedish 9.3 lineup

I can confirm it is the worst IFV ive ever played. The type 87 without a stabilizer at 9.0 is still on my lineup at 11.3 i love it because the fire rate makes it fun, also it is smol

Well it has 116mm vs the pumas 121mm, so you can have an idea, stock apds is better damage wise though sadly

1 Like

imagine how peak it would be to launch spikes with the extending parascope, like the qn506 but better

1 Like

Guess we just need to try and fix the one we have and hope and pray for the future, thoigh if we do get the D model turret i want both sweden and the Netherlands to get it at the same time. Exclusivity of vehicles like that is annoying sometimes

i agree, but if we are to add both, i think sweden should get the 50mm and the dutch obviously with their 35

Well the dutch dont have MK.IV and sweden has the MK.III D which would be similar to the ones in service with the Dutch. While im not against it the MK.IV 9050 is not the same as the ones used by the Dutch. Additionally gaijin may just avoid giving sweden a MK.III instead adding a Danish Prem version as we are set to receive them though id rather the Danish Skyranger at that point as its more unique

1 Like

the dutch MLU IS the “mk4” its just the service name. MLU is d series turret, with the 35mm option. sweden very recently bought the 3C which is somewhat similar. im saying to add the d series with the 50mm for sweden BECAUSE it is not the same as the dutch one. sweden’s d series wouldnt be unique if it had the same gun as the dutch one.

Pretty sure its the MK.III chassis, you can look it up since they dont have the 1000hp engine.

Also the 50mm gun was only mounted on the MK.IV, the 35 has been mounted on both the MK.III and the MK.IV chassis

Biggest reason for using the MK.III chassis is money, way cheaper than the bigger and heavier chassis with the 1000hp engine

probably saving the good version for premium cough bmd

Good? Even if the 9050 was added if its handled the same way the current MK.IV is it will be DOA

1 Like

I don’t think the 9050 would be DOA unless they give it really shit rounds

No spall liner, slow, poor armor? Yeah its a worse 9040 at a even higher br than the current 9030 MK.IV, you figure it out, why they would be at the same BR is beyond me. Imo the 9050 could be 11.0 or higher if added properly

1 Like

It because of Spike i guess that pretty much it Hah like spike worth anything unless they fix it.

with the 9050 at least you’d be able to pen tanks from the front unlike with the 30mm where you NEED to be side on but I get what you’re saying.

9050 also dies to a turret shot, its not remote control so theres the trade off

2 Likes