CV90105 XC-8 Optics

I’ve been shown the following report on the Issues site and I’m completely confused?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/E4ORP9oTtPuv
Image:


In English:
Good day! I honestly scoured the entire internet and did not find any detailed documentation on the optics of this turret (Cockerill XC-8). However, I will try to explain it logically.

Currently, the gunner’s optics have a magnification of 8.8x-10.0x, which was also the case with the old version of the TML turret. Now, the vehicle has been upgraded to the modern version with the Cockerill XC-8 turret. However, the magnification of the gunner’s optics remains an inconvenient 8.8x-10.0x, while the commander’s optics have a convenient 2.0x-8.0x magnification.

Visually, inside their external protection, both optical modules, for the gunner and the commander, are identical on this turret down to the rivet and the arrangement of the optical modules and sensors. Both have 4 sections for them (which means they are most likely identical in the actual model as well).

I believe that the gunner’s optics should also have a magnification similar to at least that of the commander’s, i.e., 2.0x-8.0x, and not 8.8x-10.0x as it currently is from the old TML turret.

Please recheck the data you have on the optics (as there is no publicly available data on the optics of the Cockerill XC-8 turret that I could find) and correct the magnification of the gunner’s optics. Thank you.
.

It presents no sources, states they could not find any sources, and is accepted?
I have been constantly told that I must present primary or secondary sources to get something fixed (passed as a suggestion) but somehow this report uses only the in-game model as evidence (which isn’t enough for the Chally 2’s sideskirts) and gets changed?

:(

3 Likes

Gaijin has always been very biased(

1 Like

Yeah this is unreal and not the first time nor will it probably be the last time. People biasing towards their affiliation and crying about their opposition, resulting in actual changes on vehicles happening should not be a thing. And then they advertise fully realistic vehicle models. 2nd review bomb on steam guys?

Never forget <3
image
The reason why the Challenger 2 side skirts were nerfed.

2 Likes

Stupid logic from the bug report OP, “Since I cannot find proof of something, then it must be X Y and Z, without any proof of my own to back my claim”
It is like calling the HWK 30 a fake tank because there’s zero information about it aside from what WG says and dog_pile on reddit, but in the Bundesarchive there is a document that is called the HWK-30

If I upscale the image to 2x the size then surely the thickness will double, yes? :3c

oh and when we present tape measurements we are wrong and that it isnt valid but pixel measurement is?

Apparently so…