this new sweden light tank have laser rangefinder, dm23 and thermal all this in 8.7 br really? look at he leopard A1 have dm 23 no thermal, no laser rangefinder is slower and in 9.0 br much tanks in this br have one or two category missing “no thermal,L rangefinder,or stabizilator” my opinion this new light tank not 8.7 material.
1 Like
Before you start screaming swedish bias remember there are other tanks at lower BRs with the same ability as the TML cough cough AMX 10RC
I honestly couldn’t tell you why the A1A1 is 9.0 its pretty meh imo
2 Likes
there’s one smaaall issue…
it doesn’t have a stabilizer. on 8.7.
hmmmmmm…
4 Likes
Leopard A1A1 has a full stabilizer…
It still has a rangefinder as well as good APFSDS as well.
5 Likes
Their complaint would be sound, if y’know, gaijin didn’t cut out half the functions of TML to fudge an 8.7 rating.
is a simple rangefinder not laser…
1 Like
Which does not matter unless you’re rangefinding over 2.2km or over 3km if they changed it.
1 Like
It can’t be lower.
Mobility wise plus stabilizer its pretty good, though tbf ground is just compressed to hell
1 Like
it had a higher caliber, TVD, and LRF but at the same br as Obj 685 either increase its br or remove its TVD or change the APFSDS with APDS
Looks like you forgot about the AMX 10RC with the same kit but at 8.3 lol also no stabilizer
Also thats some mad cope btw, you have a 6s autoloader, APFSDS, and a stabilizer on the 685. If you’re crying about the TML its a skill issue on your end.
(Also higher caliber? A whole 5mm lol)
so can 685 get a lower br instead?
i see you never been to SB before
Oh no im all too familiar with sim. BMDs being in the 8.7 que or the PT-76-57 at 6.7 this isn’t nearly as bad as those were lol. Again if you cant see the trade off that a stabilizer has i don’t know what to tell you. Again you want the 685 to go down in BR then have something removed off it.
Concerns about the CV90105 TML being “too OP” at BR 8.7 It’s balanced primarily by its lack of stabiliser, light armor, and limited survivability. While it shares mobility, gun performance, and optics with the AMX-30B2, it has even lighter protection, meaning it cannot play aggressively like a front-line MBT. Its 105 mm CN 105 G2 cannon is strong and versatile, but effective use relies on positioning, ambush tactics, and careful engagement rather than brawling.
Historically, the TML was previously represented at BR 10.3 with a stabiliser and commander’s thermals, which was incorrect. In the Drone Age update (2022), it was replaced with the CV90105 XC-8, reflecting the historically accurate variant.
Compared to peers, the Leopard 1A1A1 at 9.0 has a stabiliser and APFSDS rounds, giving it more flexibility for aggressive play. The TML is designed as a support/sniper-oriented vehicle, similar to the AMX-30B2 but lighter, with slightly better mobility and thermal optics at the cost of protection.
BR placements are reviewed and adjusted occasionally during official BR changes, and performance data is continuously monitored. If the TML is ever shown to genuinely overperform, the development team will take appropriate action. Thank you.
1 Like
I hate to tell you but your entire post will fall on deaf ears. Its 90% Swedish Bias if someone dies to a person whose playing sweden…
I still have to handle my moderation duty and inform people of some overall facts, and in this case its unlikely the TML is performing in the regard as “OP” But if it would be it would be addressed in the next BR changes.