this new sweden light tank have laser rangefinder, dm23 and thermal all this in 8.7 br really? look at he leopard A1 have dm 23 no thermal, no laser rangefinder is slower and in 9.0 br much tanks in this br have one or two category missing “no thermal,L rangefinder,or stabizilator” my opinion this new light tank not 8.7 material.
1 Like
Before you start screaming swedish bias remember there are other tanks at lower BRs with the same ability as the TML cough cough AMX 10RC
I honestly couldn’t tell you why the A1A1 is 9.0 its pretty meh imo
2 Likes
there’s one smaaall issue…
it doesn’t have a stabilizer. on 8.7.
hmmmmmm…
4 Likes
Leopard A1A1 has a full stabilizer…
It still has a rangefinder as well as good APFSDS as well.
5 Likes
Their complaint would be sound, if y’know, gaijin didn’t cut out half the functions of TML to fudge an 8.7 rating.
is a simple rangefinder not laser…
1 Like
Which does not matter unless you’re rangefinding over 2.2km or over 3km if they changed it.
1 Like
It can’t be lower.
Mobility wise plus stabilizer its pretty good, though tbf ground is just compressed to hell
1 Like
it had a higher caliber, TVD, and LRF but at the same br as Obj 685 either increase its br or remove its TVD or change the APFSDS with APDS
Looks like you forgot about the AMX 10RC with the same kit but at 8.3 lol also no stabilizer
Also thats some mad cope btw, you have a 6s autoloader, APFSDS, and a stabilizer on the 685. If you’re crying about the TML its a skill issue on your end.
(Also higher caliber? A whole 5mm lol)
so can 685 get a lower br instead?
i see you never been to SB before
Oh no im all too familiar with sim. BMDs being in the 8.7 que or the PT-76-57 at 6.7 this isn’t nearly as bad as those were lol. Again if you cant see the trade off that a stabilizer has i don’t know what to tell you. Again you want the 685 to go down in BR then have something removed off it.