Cv 90MKIV should get the electro-optic automatized fire control system, 40mm or the 50mm cannon and of course lacs the iron fist
APS
Gaijin should fix this
If it requires a br increase i guess we dont mind it
11 Likes
i think the 30 mm is kinda under performing at 10.7,
also this vehicle would be the first to recive aps hardkill to sweden
i agree on the optic electronic tracking, its available to nearly every 30mm on these br, but sweden lacks it on the 40mm, but on the 30mm, which lacks the he-vt it wouldnt be that op
also the lowered protection compared to the stf9040 bill has no realy payout, the spike is less relaible then the rb56 bill 2, especially since the main gun is a heafty downgrade
11 Likes
I agree. The 30mm is really not enough at that BR, especially without a fully unmanned turret
6 Likes
yeah, it really feels like a downgrade from the CV9040 BILL
-worse cannon
-slower fire rate
-no proxy rounds
-a unreliable missile
-less missiles then the CV9040 BILL
**-No LWS (this may change) **
-no tracking
-higher BR
**-a bad commanders mast that’s height can’t be adjusted **
8 Likes
More of a sidegrade but I agree
yeah, giving this the 30mm will significantly hurt the performance of the vehicle at least with ones from other nations they have tracking and HE-VT
Indeed, the only benefit the current Mk4 has is having the mobility of the pre-nerf CV90120 and spikes being okay-ish for anti-heli use.
1 Like
the weight and armor are currently wrong so it will be slightly better if they actually fix them but even still it looks like it might be DOA due to the bill just being better.
1 Like
Ive compared it in an 1v1 with my friend using the mkiv, Ive used the bill and in 90% ive won in different scenarios, MKIV sometimes cant pen the front plate of the bill, i was almost as agile as the mkiv
So the MKIV definitelly a lacksluster in every aspect
currently as of now the armor on the CV9040 BILL is better, the armor and weight are both incorrect on the MKIV and will hopefully be fixed other than that I still see the bill being better cause the lack of a good cannon or APS/with LWS
I feel like full on APS is a bit over the top, i’d be well satisfied with the Bushmaster 3 instead of the dinky Bushmaster 2
What is being implemented is the Demonstrator vehicle, this is likely an interim vehicle until we can see the CV9035 Mk.III C being implemented with the D turret, Akeron MP, 35mm bushmaster, IRST etc. Take this vehicle with a grain of salt and see it for what it is, a demonstrator. There will be bug reports for some missing features tho.
I also dont believe we have seen any Mk.IV with the 40mm Bofors canon, its been seen and tried with 30, 35 and 50mm Bushmasters by my knowledge.
1 Like
for the additional research cost i guess
KF-41 and Puma VTF and the Namer series, have all been added, the CV90 is one of the best IFV’s in the world and we keep getting given subpar additions to the game, not to mention the blatant ignorance from gaijin regarding UTAAS and AHEAD… It’s going to be DOA if it doesn’t see some sort of buff before we get it in the live server, be it the 35mm, APS, better mobility or a buff to the Spike (because it’s hot dogwater)…10.7 for a vehicle that get’s outmatched by a earlier counterpart that doesn’t have stab over 30mkh? we need better…this patch…
1 Like
Exactly, it now requires 400k rp but it should only need 350k at most