Im not a sweden tech tree fan but its awful to see the way they treat cv90s. “Cv90s have different way of tracking - okay, we heard you, we arent adding anything at all”. “Cv9030/35s have abm - okay, we heard you, we arent adding anything at all”.
Its weird that cv90s cant even have their real features but japan tech tree, for example, gets 2 vehicles (1 is premium) made from a wooden mockup. I dont see them being unobtainable like maus, e100 or koelian, why, Gaijin? Anyway that hori thing should be discussed more in other topic.
2 Likes
They get more, but they kinda need em as tech tree fillers (R2Y2 anyone?)
But so does sweden, only nation without a single tech tree heavy.
But yeah, they are not treating the Swedish vehicles with much respect, even less so the CV90 family of vehicles.
2 Likes
Is there any information on the range of the PS-05 mk3? An educated guess would most likely put it around 180km, or perhaps even more.
At least 300km.
Dang, I was pretty close to the base version of 160km. But we’re probably not seeing the upgraded mk 3 till we get better missiles, and perhaps a JAS39C (late)?
1 Like
As with the CV90s i would like for them to actually right the version of the radar so we dont have to walk around being in the loop of “why” and building up frustration…
1 Like
Now with the release of typhoons and rafales with aesa (no matter how incomplete)
It is dubbly important to get the radars right as there is now a lot of talk about introducing EWS. And besides the F-35 big ol’ dunptrucknof a radar, we all know the ES/05a raven is currently the leading system when it comes to electronic warfare. And would tenfold the power of the gripen systems.
Nonetheless, I can realise when were getting off topic. This is about getting the CV90 family we deserve. Not about radars, gripens or EWS.
My bad.
Fingers crossed the CV9030 MK.IV gets something decent fixed tomorrow
3 Likes
Iirc it had lws on the dev server so why in gods name would that be removed on the live server the module is even there. Hopefully it will be added back
Any bug reports that were passed recently?
They pulled this one back 3 days ago, but no news other than that.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/gpsdynIQEnn5
These are the only two i know of:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/7Fr8A6fb8sg1
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/XgUBuQ1l65kD
The hilarity of it being denied using another game as a source lmafo
Why is that funny? There are very likely games out there that has vehicle named the same but has like a top speed of 200km/h and that shoots lasers when fully upgraded. Games ar quite literally not a “source” for any kind of real world information.
Gaijin do state what sources are acceptable when making reports like these:
The used a video from the game steel beasts to argue the FCS was the same… That’s why it’s hilarious.
I think that is not about the game itself but more showing what the tracking function in the CV90 is actually like IRL, that video likely wouldn’t be passed as a source had it been used for a bug report, but it is effective in describing the IRL feature and how it works.
1 Like
So why is it being used as a counter argument in a bug report… If it can’t stand on its own, that’s why i find it funny.
It isn’t. the argument is “the tracking on the CV90 is not video tracking, the tracking works like this: [video]” So where that video comes from doesn’t really matter if it is just to show how it works and not as proof that that system is what is present on the MK.IV.
The proof they are claiming is that the symbology for air tracking the laser-trig way is still present on the MK.IV and no new symbology for video-/IR-tracking is present or shown in any BAE videos.
The lack of proof for the VTM being installed is also default proof as a general rule.
Ok dude whatever you say lol