Curtiss XP-62 - Curtiss' Final Gasp

Would you like to see this in-game?
  • Yes
  • No
0 voters

Curtiss XP-62

   Hello everybody. I’d like to introduce and suggest the Curtiss XP-62 as a potential addition to U.S. aviation in War Thunder. The XP-62 was the final fighter design by Curtiss for the US Army Air Forces, created in hopes of securing a wartime production contract during World War II. This unique aircraft, built only as a single prototype, stands as the largest interceptor developed for the Army. Unfortunately, by the time it made its first flight, the Army had deemed the XP-62 unnecessary, leading to the program’s cancellation in 1943.

Key Characteristics

  • Army interceptor
  • Air-conditioned pressurized cockpit
  • A 2,300 hp 18-cylinder Wright R-3350 Duplex-Cyclone engine with a turbo-supercharger
  • 4 x 20-mm cannon guns

Conclusion | Why it should be in the game

   The Curtiss XP-62 represents one of Curtiss’s final relentless efforts to innovate during wartime despite ultimately not entering production. Adding the XP-62 to USA Aviation in War Thunder could offer a powerful interceptor option since it was equipped with four 20 mm cannons instead of the typical M2 Brownings. As the last Army fighter-interceptor designed by Curtiss, the XP-62 would serve as a fitting tribute to Curtiss’ contributions to WWII-era aircraft design, marking its final attempt to move beyond the pre-war P-40 Warhawk. In terms of gameplay, the XP-62’s performance, size, and weight would closely mirror the Dornier Do-335, making it a compelling and unique addition to the game.

Sources

Literature

Aircraft Model Images

Thank you for taking the time to read my suggestion! 😃

2 Likes

I think this would make for a very good premium. Was there really no suspended armament? Additionally it looks like there are 4 cannons per wing for 8 total.

1 Like

An absolute +1 from me! Could make for a good premium actually

yes funny fat turboprop is a go.

That thing looks like a fighter version of a Helldiver, basically…

Yep. SB2C and XP-62 shared similar fuselages, tail fins, and landing gear fairings, and both were designed by Curtiss, of course. ;)

Nope, as far as my research goes, no suspended armament was seriously considered or discussed for the aircraft. XP-62 was intentionally to serve as a dedicated interceptor for the Army. That’s it. There isn’t sufficient technical documentation available online to say otherwise. Indeed, that’s not the case for P-38 Lightning being the pure interceptor at first…

In reality, the XP-62 was planned to have four cannons as a final decision during the review in January 1942. The Army wanted to reduce the armament from 8 to 4 to cut off the excessive weight, from 15,568 lbs (7,070 kg) to 14,000 lbs (6,350 kg). It was reached that decision even before the construction of XP-62 was finished.

Where did you read turboprop?

Don’t turboprops usually have two props that are counter rotating in set much like the image?

Not always. In fact, turboprops can have a single 3-blade or 4-blade propeller to drive them like this aircraft, for example. However, this XP-62 was powered by a huge radial engine. Having contra-rotating propellers doesn’t necessitate the turboprop engine as long as the piston engine produces enough power.

Well that was my first thought when seeing it.

+1! I love my countries aircrafts!

Ki_44_I_contra_rotating_propellor

Exactly look close there are two sets of props there facing opposite Directions

1 Like

Well that one has a radial engine.

Are turboprops not allowed to be radial also the engine being used is the upgrade engine for the B-29 so don’t know how they stuffed it to the curtiss. But it’s american so proably found a way

…Do you know what a turboprop is?

1 Like

yes
image
Wright Turbo-cyclone
image

That’s a JET ENGINE

That is NOT a jet engine

1 Like

Explain how a prop engine is a jet engine I feel you do not no the difference which is scary.