Curtiss XP-40Q-2A Warhawk - Ultimate Super Warhawk

Would you like to see this in-game?
  • Yes
  • No
0 voters

Curtiss XP-40Q-2A Warhawk

   Hello everybody. I’d like to introduce and suggest the Curtiss XP-40Q-2A Warhawk for USA Aviation, and this is my final suggestion for the P-40 variants in the US Army Air Corps and US Army Air Force services. The XP-40Q-2A prototype was an experimental P-40Q (Model 87X) project to produce a Warhawk aircraft with the standards of more modern fighters such as the P-51 Mustang and P-47 Thunderbolt. This prototype would make itself the fastest P-40 variant as a result of the introduction of two-stage superchargers.


Key Characteristics

  • High-altitude fighter
  • Four-bladed propeller
  • Bubble canopy
  • 4 x .50-cal. M2 Browning wing-mounted machine guns
  • Water-injected V-1710-121 engine with two-stage superchargers

History

The XP-40Q development began in 1943 to improve the P-40 and its performance ahead of newer fighter aircraft. The management at Curtiss acknowledged the P-40 was not up to the standards of the North American P-51 Mustang, Republic P-47 Thunderbolt, or Lockheed P-38 Lightning. The P-40 was woefully outmatched at the high-altitude performance, as it only had a single-stage supercharger and fell behind these superior fighters and Chance Vought F4U Corsair and Grumman F6F Hellcat.

Fearing Curtiss’ P-40 production lines being shut down and going out of business, the program built and designated the three prototypes as the XP-40Qs. These prototypes were built from other P-40 airframes (P-40K-10, P-40K-1, and P-40N-25, respectively). They all had four .50-cal. machine guns with 235 rounds per gun. All were powered by two-stage supercharged Allison V-1710 engines and a four-blade propeller.

Per my suggestion, we focus on a specific airframe of the second P-40Q variant - the XP-40Q-2A of P-40K-1 with a serial number 42-45722 and a long fuselage design.

The XP-40Q-1, with its ancient features, flew its test flights in June 1943, but Curtiss concluded they could do better and proceeded with the second prototype - XP-40Q-2 - in November 1943.

The XP-40Q-2 was fitted with a bubble canopy and had a chin scoop, including the oil cooler and air intake, under the nose in a slimmer configuration than the typical P-40. The radiators had been incorporated and remained in the leading edge of the wings. This aircraft originally had rounded wing tips like those on the typical Warhawks, but these were later clipped by one foot, giving them a square appearance. This model originally retained the olive drab paint.

The XP-40Q-2 had its first flight testing at Eglin Field, Florida, in January 1944 and completed a series of flight tests in Buffalo, New York, in March 1944. With a more powerful V-1710-121 engine, it produced 1,425 hp at takeoff and 1,800 hp with water injection at 20,000 feet. This model recorded a top speed of 422 mph (679 km/h) at 20,000 ft (6,096 meters). Test pilots noted the Q-2 had excellent visibility and handling, as it was very maneuverable and capable of pulling a tight turn radius. The test flights were recognized and praised, so it prompted a recommendation for two additional prototypes to be constructed.

The XP-40Q-2 was damaged in an accident during testing on March 24, 1944, when the aircraft was nosed over. The aircraft was repaired and sent to Wright Field, Ohio, in the middle of 1944 for further testing.

The focus switched to testing on the next model - XP-40Q-2A - almost entirely identical to the XP-40Q-2. The XP-40Q-2A was built on a P-40K-1 airframe with serial 42-45722 and had an unpainted natural metal finish. The Q-2A had different modifications to its cockpit and canopy, and it incorporated automatic cooling shutters for the inner wing intakes. This aircraft had a P-51ish look; however, the wings on the aircraft were the original P-40 thickness and not the laminar types used on the P-51 Mustang.

The Q-2A’s first flight occurred before the end of March 1944, and the flight testing showed performance to be broadly comparable to the original Q-2. Suddenly, the Q-2A was plagued with Allison engine problems, and the Q-2A spent a long time being repaired instead of undergoing testing.

The original Q-2 was damaged again when it ground looped while landing on July 31, 1944. It is unknown if the aircraft was repaired again or damaged beyond repairs.

As a result, the US Army Air Forces moved on to the next prototype, the Q-3, and loaned the Q-2A to Allison for further engine tests. Unfortunately, the USAAF lost its interest in continuing the development of the production P-40Q and did not place orders because other aircraft with superior performance were already available in the inventory. Even with these modifications, the XP-40Q prototype was still inferior to modern fighters, and the project was canceled.

Warhawk production finally ceased in November 1944, although the war was not over. It marked the beginning of the end for Curtiss as a business.

The XP-40Q-2A survived the end of the war in the possessions of Allison. This aircraft was declared surplus and sold to Joe Ziegler. He acquired and registered it as NX300B as the racing aircraft. The Q-2A entered and competed in the 1947 Thompson Trophy Race as an unqualified racer. Sadly, when it was running in fourth place, it caught on fire and was destroyed in the ongoing race, with the pilot bailing out and suffering a broken leg. It appeared that its unsolved reliability issues with the engine struck once again and ended the legendary Warhawk of P-40Q as we know it.

With a top speed of 422 mph (679 km/h) at 20,000 ft (6,096 meters), the XP-40Q was faster than every variant, even the P-40N-1. No P-40 Warhawk with a single-speed supercharger could ever approach at 400 mph (640 km/h).


Specifications

Curtiss XP-40Q-2A Warhawk

General Characteristics

  • Crew: 1 (Pilot)
  • Length: 35 ft 4 in in (10.77 m)
  • Height: 10 ft 10.8 in (3.32 m)
  • Span: 35 ft 2.5 in (10.73 m)
  • Wing Area: 236 sq ft (21.93 sq m)
  • Propeller Type: Four-bladed Curtiss electric controllable propeller
  • Powerplant: Allison V-1710-121 liquid-cooled piston engine
    • water injection
    • two-stage superchargers
      → 1,800 hp (1,324 kW)
  • Internal Fuel: 157 US gal. (594 L)
  • Water-injection Capacity: 11 US gal. (41.6 L)
  • Empty Weight: 6,400 lb (2,902 kg)
  • Gross Weight: 9,000 lb (4,082 kg)
  • Max. Takeoff Weight: 10,000 lb (4,536 kg)

Engine ratings

  • Takeoff:

    → 1,425 bhp @ 3,200 rpm @ S.L.

  • War Emergency - Water-Injected:

    → 1,800 hp @ 3,200 rpm @ 12,000 - 33,000 ft (3,658 - 10,058 m)

  • Military:

    → 1,100 bhp @ 3,000 rpm @ S.L. - 25,000 ft (7,620 m)

  • Normal:

    → 1,000 bhp @ 3,000 rpm @ S.L. - 21,000 ft (6,400 m)

Performance

  • Power-to-Weight Ratio: 0.20 hp/lb (0.32 kW/kg)
  • Critical Altitude Speed:
    • 420 mph (676 km/h) @ 15,000 ft (4,572 m) @ war emergency @ 3,000 rpm
    • 422 mph (679 km/h) @ 20,500 ft (6,248 m) @ water injection @ 3,200 rpm
  • Wing Loading: 38.1 lb/sq ft (186.02 kg/sq m)
  • Rate of Climb: 4,410 fpm (22.4 m/s) @ 5,000 ft (1,524 m) @ water-injection
  • Time to Altitude: 4.8 minutes to 20,000 ft (6,096 m)
  • Service Ceiling: 39,000 ft (11,887 m)
  • Combat Range: 700 miles (1,127 km)

Armament

  • Guns:
    • 4 x .50-cal. M2 Browning machine guns (235 rpg, 940 rounds)

Supplemental Data


Diagrams


Images


Conclusion | Why it should be in the game

   I made this suggestion to request more World War II-era vehicles for War Thunder. I feel the XP-40Q-2A would be a wonderful candidate as the premium/battle pass aircraft provides an opportunity for the players to fly the Warhawk variant that is more competent in high-altitude combat. Performance-wise, the XP-40Q-2A certainly would perform better than every Warhawk variant, even the P-40N-5. Thus, this XP-40Q-2A would make a welcoming addition to the P-40 Warhawk family for US Aviation.


See Also – P-40 Family


Sources


Thank you for taking the time to read my suggestion! 😃

8 Likes

I saw the title and didn’t even need to read the suggestion a million times, yes! This gets my absolute +1

3 Likes

Need this in my life!!!

2 Likes

Same here, voted yes without thinking. Knew what this was about lol.

3 Likes

All the XP-40Qs belong in game

+1

1 Like

Indeed, I just saw XP-40Q and ignored everything else lol

3 Likes

+1, if only for the water injection. I’m more of an axis enjoyer but this has been one of my top picks for a new addition for a while now.

For the flying tigers!

yes please +1

Do you intend to suggest the first version of the XP-40Q? (without clipped wings)

1 Like

Do you mean XP-40Q-1 without a bubble canopy or XP-40Q-2 with a bubble canopy and round wings? ;)

Either way, I don’t plan to suggest further suggestions for the XP-40Q family. However, if you want to suggest one of the XP-40Qs, go ahead. I’ll give you +1 and support.

3 Likes

As much as Google Translate helps me a lot,
It has some limitations, so I prefer to just support the suggestions.
But I was referring to the XP-40Q with bubble canopy with original P-40 wings.
image

Or maybe an XP-40N
image

Either way, you have my support!
I would love to see suggestions for the XP-60A and XP-60E
image
image
I think I’m a Curtiss fan…

1 Like

Ah yes. In the image, it was the same XP-40Q-2 before its wings got clipped. I think round wings and clipped wings should be part of the modifications for the players to choose to have round or clipped wings. That would be ideal.

EDIT: The aircraft in the image was not the XP-40Q-2A but an XP-40Q-2. Both were different aircraft with different serial numbers.

I am working on XP-60 suggestions. 😃

3 Likes

I was actually about to ask if you were lol

1 Like

Thank you sir! 😃

1 Like

Hope for more p-40s kinda sad we only have two plus the wonky C- variant as a premium

3 Likes

But doesn’t this generate a change in performance?
I think that both speed and maneuverability change in this case.

With clipped wings, they increased roll rate and maximum possible airspeed at lower altitudes. In exchange, the rate of turn and rate of climb are decreased.

Conversely, the aircraft with the round wings has a slower roll rate, but it can still maneuver well at slower speeds and climb far better.

So, to answer your question, yes, this generated a change in performance, which I considered minor or almost negligible.

I couldn’t find any technical data or source to show the performance data for the XP-40Q-2 with the round wings. 😕

2 Likes

Can’t wait to +1 them, P-40s with R-2800s sounds like a fantastic combo.

2 Likes