CS/SA5at 12.0? Same BR as the Pantsir?

Friends, visit my topic and you will find out that the FB-10A missiles are not only infrared but also must be radio command as parl even Wikipedia has about it

5 Likes

Wikipedia is not a source, just saying. Thankfully we do have brochures, but it runs in the issue of there’s no IR + DL in game (and I honestly no idea how to actually this can be modeled, beyond just copying ARH mechanic and replacing radar homing with IR)

1 Like

Seems like China really has it worse (has been for a while)

4 Likes

IR + DL is modelled in game, it indeed works similar to ARH, just with IR instead fo radar. It’s implemented on the IRIS-T SLM and AIM-9X blk2.

1 Like

Dosen’t look welcomed.

Make it 11.3 or 11.7 it will be more suitable…

1 Like

Well, it just was an explanation that I heard from one of the tech mods (I think?) why CS/SA5 isnt it

1 Like

Yup. Truer words have never been spoken. Gaijin has consistently proven the systematic underperformance of Chinese vehicles. Even the ZTZ99A has been plagued by typical Gaijin errors since its release. We had the DTC10-125 scandal, and then the spall liners (which has been accepted for the ZTZ99A but is yet to be implemented), and a plethora of modeling errors.

And oh boy, the CS/SA5 is just salt on the wound. They outright refuse to correctly model the FB-10 missiles. This thing is supposed to be 12.0? What a joke. In its current state it is a pile of burning hot garbage.
Gaijin is literally baiting classified information at this point. Why doesn’t Gaijin provide sources? Why are they so critical when they can’t even do it themselves? There is not a single source out there that says the FB-10 does not have radio command guidance and IIR. Naturally, Gaijin allows obscure Russian documents to slip past but then draw the line on the FB-10? Real fun stuff.

5 Likes

Insane bias by Gaijin

4 Likes