I get what they’re saying.
15 missiles that can guide themselves and be launched from complete cover is indeed a big issue for balance.
Believing that someone’s rage baiting you and still replying to him is peak WT forum.
“no one care about sim”
i care
1 Like
you want the game to turn into MWT.
Yeah Gaijin says they want this but again: selective realism
Yes this is balance, but when has Gaijin done this successfully. It’s hard to find a balance between IRL and in game. Thing is typhoons never had IR FnF A2G missiles so there’s legit nothing to do for balance.
never happening, copium is also off the table
you know it
I want everyone to have viable CAS, a one sided META is unbearable for long time play
And the current defentition of viable CAS is a mach 1.5+ IR AGM available in numbers of roughly 6
1 Like
you know maybe instead of giving op cas, why not think of a solution for other aspect first that make the cas less powerfull.
you know like maps / new gen battery air defense with aesa / rework spawn / limit the rearme to 2 times only.
adding is not the only solution, fixing is
Well, if you consider that Brimstones are in fact, an extension of the Hellfire family of missiles.
There are “options”.
For now, Japan has joined Russia for meta cas. But at least Germany has the best SPAA to counter CAS, not by alot though. Imagine if they hadn’t added multi-vehicle spaa, would be ball cancer. But looks like Russia and Japan will hold the reign for a couple more years while America is stuck with agms from 1960s and typhhoons are stuck with spice.
Still not IR Brimstone but nothing is stopping you from asking for those options.
Fixing the game is removing the KH-38MT (not ML) but we’re far past a stage where that was a reasonable response.
SPAA has never been an ideal counter to OP CAS since gaijin powercreeps CAS every time they add new SPAA
Spawn changes are also irrelevant if the game modes remain the same, and my suggested SPAA changes haven’t even been acknowledged by suggestion staff, showing a lack of regard from gaijin on the matter when paired with the answers from various CM and Q&As
My position on it changed based on new evidence, there is atleast a single missile from one brochure mounted to what looks like a MIG-29 of some flavour. It existed in a real enough form for inclusion into the game, in keeping with numerous other weapon systems.
2 Likes
imagine framing this as a bad thing
1 Like
removing the kh38mt will just make more people to ask for better AGM for russia, they cant keep up with only kh29t.
also of we remove the so callet kh38mt, people will start abusing gps / loft of the missile.
The missile that’s broadly equivalent to the Maverick & hammer ?
How so? Theres no evidence of it ever being tested in any capacity and no documentation other than that single brochure. For all we know its not even capable of tracking targets like tanks and the seeker might have purely the same function as on cruise missiles like storm shadow.
Imagine even comparing TV missiles with IR+IOG ones.
1 Like
pretty sure that was a mockup, there’s a close up of the model and it’s obvious the seeker’s aperture installed is opaque; I’ll see if I can find it.
It’s still far less oppressive than the MT since you can’t get a free 6x multikill, and you experience an element of luck that everyone else gets to face with their respective AGMs and bombs