Constant nation bickering

I think its fair to say the forum always had an issue with nations and their equipment.

Some come from the fact that a nation has their equipment in other trees (wether that be a variant with differences or a 1 to 1 copy). This is also prevalent in numerous suggestions where there’s arguments on whether it’s needed or fair thanks to prior vehicles.

Then there’s operating countries and subtrees. There’s been plenty of discussion on which nation would receive what subs (As seen with the discussions about Greece and Cyprus) and wether one or multiple countries become a new tree. Some suggest the via operating countries while others suggest addition based on the manufacturer country (which gajin seems to prioritise the operator over manufacturer). There’s also been plenty of sim discussion on Allies Vs Axis and NATO Vs WSP due to subs and certain vehicles breaking the system.

The only way to quell the arguments unfortunately would be to do away with nation trees (and the 1 to 1 copies) which would be easier said than done to put it lightly in gameplay perspectives.

Anyone got any thoughts?

1 Like

On one announcement split the world up into what tree goes where. Go off of Empires and close alliances from 1900 onwards for simplicity

British empire + Commonwealth of nations to britain.

French empire and BeNeLux to france

Switzerland and argentina to germany

rest of europe to Italy

former soviet nations to USSR

unclaimed Asian nations from empires to Japan unless korean tree is added, then put most of them there

Pakistan and bangladesh to china

South america between israel and USA

Scandinavia + finland to sweden

Problem solved

1 Like

Don’t mean to be that guy, but we are Scandinavian, Finland isn’t, would be better to say Nordic nations, or to use the current Nordic allience being NORDEFCO

1 Like

was one or the other and i flipped a coin.